Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pill as Pollutant (Pill-derived estrogen in water supply causing intersex)
National Review Online ^ | April 22, 2008 | Iain Murray

Posted on 04/22/2008 9:57:42 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Petronski

We’re all more betterly clinging to our guns and religion here in small town PA.


21 posted on 04/22/2008 1:27:35 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
1, The article doesn't answer the question: If the estrogen in waste-water comes from the urine of women who take birth control pills, why wouldn't all young healthy women release estrogen in their urine?

2. What about all the older women taking estrogen supplements? (This number is lower now.) Does the author want to ban this too?

3. There are now a number of products for both men and women that involve hormones applied to the skin. In this case the hormone can be washed directly into the sewer system without even being processed through the body.

22 posted on 04/22/2008 1:43:10 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Morning-after abortion pills aren’t pollutants. They are safe and effective. Carbon dioxide is the real pollutant. The government told me so.


23 posted on 04/22/2008 1:43:28 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“I think this is something more than genderqueer guppies.....”

Yeah, probably genderqueer journalism just to start with....


24 posted on 04/22/2008 1:46:38 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Yes, estrogen is a naturally occurring part of the ecosystem. And I’d really like to see reliable data on historic concentrations adjusted for the increasing sensitivity of measurement techniques. When a buffalo or caribou goes by the concentrations is local streams must increase some, even a few centuries back.

Endocrine disruptor claims have been going on for years. Might be true. Might not. Case hasn’t been made.


25 posted on 04/22/2008 2:41:48 PM PDT by cosine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
Those are all good questions, and --- as you said --- not answered in the article. As I mentioned previously, there are 55,000 articles out there on google alone, and some of them are of course more research-intensive and scholarly. I think Science and Scientific American have done more detailed reporting.

One possible distinction --- here I'm just musing or speculating --- would be between women's naturally-occurring estrogens on the one hand, and estrogenic chemicals used in oral contraceptives and hormone-replacement therapies on the other. Women's naturally-occuring estrogens are at a level normal for the body and quite complexly in-sync with other hormones, metabolic products and catalysts. The healthy body knows how to use or metabolize them effectively.

On the other hand, HRT estrogen can put women's bodies seriously out-if-whack. Females my age have been really whiplashed by the controversies over the past 20 years: women who faithfully and conscientiously "treated" menopause on their doctor's advice, found themselves at elevated risk for pulmonary embolism, coronary heart disease and stroke, even greater risk of osteoporosis (which it was supposed to prevent or cure). And then they kept re-jiggering the dosages and tweaking the formulations to add varying amounts of progesterone and even testosterone, etc.

One's evaluation of it depends on what one considers to be "optimal, normal" menopause, which has never been adequately defined ---or even whether menopause itself is considered a healthy phase or a regrettabke and reversible symptom of aging and decline.

It's even more striking with OC's, where the purpose of the hormone is to thwart what are clearly healthy and natural physiological processes. My hypothesis is that deliberately disrupting normal cycles interferes with the body's ability to regulate levels; hence the body just tries to excrete the excess.

That's just my guess.

26 posted on 04/22/2008 2:45:12 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I believe cross-species estrogens and hormones can also be a problem. The drug Premarin has warnings about taking it during pregnancy. However, Premarin is completely natural,coming from pregnant mares. One estrogen in particular, is not found in the human metabolic pathway, that estrogen being estrone. Estrone is a very potent estrogen.

The reason, estrone and some of the other estrogens, in Premarin may be a problem for the fetus, is they do not bind to the human alpha fetal proteins. The fetal alpha proteins do bind to the maternal estrogens, preventing them from having deleterious effects on the fetus. I believe the exogenous hormones may well suppress the development of the pituitary and the hypothalamus, during gestationl. That would explain atypical sexual development.

This would apply to both natural (cross-species) and synthetic estrogens. Other chemicals that are of concern are progesterones, some of them will act as potent androgen blockers. Example: Cyproterone acetate, which is used as treatment for female hirsutism in europe. It is known to cause deformities in genital development in the fetus. It is also known to influence the sexual behavior of rats, when administered at the right period during gestation in rats. Presumably, it would also affect the sexual behavior in human males, making their behavior more feminine.

Other androgen blockers of concer would be finasteride, and similar drugs used to treat male pattern baldness.

Now, testosterone exposure to the fetus will tend to masculinize girl fetuses. Sometimes, the testoterone comes from the fetus itself. In the condition,known as Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, there is a metabolic error that does not allow the adrenal gland to convert testosterone into cortisol. The end result is testosterone accumulates in the fetus, producing masculinization of the genitals and masculinizaiton of behavior patterns.


27 posted on 04/22/2008 6:12:24 PM PDT by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: punster

Correction regarding estrogens in Premarin. After I posted, I remembered the estrogen unique to horses is equilin, instead of estrone.


28 posted on 04/22/2008 8:42:12 PM PDT by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: punster
Thank you for this detailed information.

It seems to me (a non-expert) that the prenatal development of normal sexual anatomy and physiology is a multiplex and delicate process, and affects, of course, the whole prenatal person, including brain development as well as sexual morphology.

If I were pregnant, I almost think I'd want to grow my own veggies and rise my own chickens in the backyard, drink distilled water, and generally avoid all the hormone disruptors, xenoestrogens and related crap.

I do wish people would "turn the clock forward," stop using contraceptives that were deliberately designed to disrupt normal hormonal physiology, and practice state-of-the-art, 21st Century birth control as the best way to do NFP.

29 posted on 04/23/2008 7:45:17 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

Thanks neverdem.


30 posted on 04/23/2008 9:11:20 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

But what if the fish prefer intersex? With humans it’s just an “alternative lifestyle.” And we shouldn’t impose our morality on others, right?


31 posted on 04/23/2008 2:35:11 PM PDT by Berosus (Support our troops, bring them home -- from the Balkans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Thank you for your kind words. I will agree that caution, concerning diet, is really important during pregnancy. My feelings are, women should be avoiding taking hormonal preparations, both natural and synthetic, during pregnancy.


32 posted on 04/23/2008 10:13:20 PM PDT by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Berosus

Gills and thrills. :’)


33 posted on 04/23/2008 10:42:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
We all need to do our share in action or at least by spreading the word to as many as possible regarding the sad reality regarding the effects of such unnatural means of contraception. This is one of the main factors that I am proud of supporting the use of chemical free contraceptive like a reliable fertility monitor.
34 posted on 07/30/2009 12:04:50 AM PDT by LadyComp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson