Posted on 04/18/2008 6:40:10 AM PDT by paterfamilias
What interests me is why Mahr says such a thing in the first place. Is it because the Pope disagrees with Homosexuality? Is it because the Pope disagrees with Abortion? Is it because the Pope is Christian? I always find it very interesting how liberals define their enemies. The criteria they use appears somewhat insane because those who are most likely to try to kill them they are quick to defend and make excuses for but people who hold opinions that stand in the way of radical sexual activism and violence against the unborn are viewed as on the level with Nazis? People like Mahr continue to dilute the horror of the holocaust with their misuse of the word Nazi.
got it. thanks
See my tagline. THEY’RE not Nazi’s!!!!
Maher is an A-hole, but why does everyone have to apologize for everything these days?
He meant what he said. Oh well. Why demand an insincere apology?
In all the world, across continents and oceans and nationalities, the RCC could find no man up to the task of being pope other than someone who had been a member of the Hitler Youth and whose father was in the S.S.
I wish he’d show how apologetic he is by holding his breath until the Pope is back at the Vatican.
Libertarian radio commentator Michael Graham ( often posted here on FR ) also brags about being a close friend of Maher. Doesn't put him in my favorites column considering I only agree with him about half the time. I can always forgive Ann.
For many years I thought that any idiotic, flaming azzhole, could make stupid, insulting, sarcastic, truth twisting, remarks.
Boy, was I wrong.
No....it's true!
That’s cuz they’re national socialists themselves...
And smells like a dirty diaper.
Nice comment.
Now let’s see, there is a precedent within the long history of the Church of imperfect people rising to lead her.
There was this guy named Saul who passed his time persecuting early Christians, that is after he was knocked off his donkey by a Divine vision. After a name change, he became Peter’s right-hand man, converted the Gentiles, and died a glorious martyr’s death.
And then there was Augustine of Hippo, who lived a life probably not too dissimilar to Maher’s: whoring, drinking, etc. That is, until his conversion, when he became a Prince of the Church and one of her greatest theologians.
We Christians believe in redemption. Apparently, Rabbi Schneier, here in New York, does too.
Now you can go back into your hole.
Whose worse, big nose bill maher (the proud liberal), or his Maoist audience?
Maher’s nazi obsession—
1. The government should have gunned down the Weavers.
2. The Pope is a nazi because while living in a militarized police state he was forced to join Hitler Youth.
3. The “world is Mel Gibson” and all criticism of Israel is the result of latent Nazi sympathies.
Stick to the pot legalization stuff, Bill.
No, you only have to apologize for saying things that aren’t true. :)
Whenever I mention nazi to a liberal, I always say "Nazi Socialist" to connect the lib to them. Always an interesting response. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.