I heard the other day that no U.S. president has ever attended the Olympics. If that's true, what a great idea to start with a country as wonderful as China!
(The scenes of chaos were a public relations disaster for the Olympics, with activists using the opportunity to vent their anger.)
Perhaps they could have thought of that before awarding the Olympics to a dictatorship. Any kind of black eye would reflect badly at not only China, but also at the IOC who awarded it the games. This would finally make them think twice before risking another fiasco.
As far as hitting the "point", a boycott would be, as Marisa Tomei so eloquently said in My Cousin Vinny.........
Dead on, balls accurate
Quiet diplomacy is the cop-out.
China is a dictatorship, it will not allow athletes to make religious or political statements, still persecutes Christians and charges them with crimes which could have the death penalty, and of course, mistreats Tibet.
The IOC should never have awarded this nation the honour, and Bush should not even consider going. If it is true that no president has ever gone to an opening ceremony in another country, it is not a “boycott” to not go now, but it is appeasement if he does go.
Speedo's strong suit New technology draws closer scrutiny as records fall
China and the Olympics would suffer more than the individual athletes. The Olympic Committee made it political when they chose China as a host nation. It's not like they didn't know what China was.
This is in our hands.