NATO's "Final Solution" Blitzkrieg Against Kosovo's Serbs

INTERVIEW: Scott Taylor, Regarding a Secret Plan by the Western Alliance for Kosovo

During the next few weeks there will be an artificially provoked attack, bigger than March 17th, the borders around Kosovska Mitrovica will be closed, Serbian leaders arrested, the Serbs disarmed, the city handed over to the Albanians in the KPS, claims a well-known Canadian reporter, Scott Taylor, author of a number of books about the Balkans.

- "NATO is preparing a blitzkrieg on Kosovo which will enable them to tear down the Serbian resistance in the whole area, and as early as the next few weeks, will artificially provoke another attack bigger than March 17th's was. It will close the borders around Kosovska Mitrovica, arrest the Serbian leaders, disarm the Serbs and then hand over the city to the Albanians in the KPS. Since the border between Kosovo and Albania doesn't exist, after this plan the northern part of "Greater Albania" will definitely be secured. American and Albanian leaders have come to a "deal" that NATO secures new borders, and everything that I have seen in this in my most recent visit to Kosovo, proves that such an agreement -- about which we found out from secret UNMIK papers -- really exists", says Scott Taylor during his interview with Glas. Scott Taylor is a reporter from Canada who has followed the Kosovo crisis for years and who, based on more than twenty visits to the province, claims that nothing quite like this has happened before. "UNMIK and NATO know the truth about the suffering of the Serbs and the creation of a Greater Albania, but they intend to listen to the dictate of America", says Taylor and he adds:

- "This time I met a number of people in UNMIK who know the truth and who have evaluated the situation, who pass on their advice, but their suggestions are ignored. They know what really happened on March 17th and they were critical about it, and now they are seeing that a new plan exists, which will give rise to even more violence and they are impatient to let others know what is ahead – maybe to soothe their own consciences. This is what they are saying…

- "They were expelled, and the customs buildings were burned. Now they have come back, and the American and French troops are in place and preparing to close the customs borders. They intend to use UNIMIK's police with the consent of KFOR to arrest the Serbian leadership, so that the Serbs will be provoked. Their aim is a response, a reaction – we can recall how it was the last time, but now they want to respond with more force. For this action they will use Polish and Ukrainian troops who will move in an aggressive military attack on Mitrovica. The goal is to eliminate the Serbian leadership, to elicit a provocation in order to pronounce "Martial Law" when they close the Serbian part of Mitrovica and disarm the Serbs while the borders are closed. And then, under those conditions, they will hand over Mitrovica to the KPS."

"The Galluci document (UNMIK's head for the Mitrovica sector) states that there are not even attempts to enable the return of the Serbian KPS police; that was an open and later forgotten issue. They know that the Serbs will fight against this and they want just that kind of provocation to give them the excuse to use additional force. But they came to this idea of using the Poles and Ukrainians because they have shown sympathy for the Serbs. If the Serbs fight back, which is the idea, then this will blacken the image of Serbs in the Ukraine and Poland. Therefore, they have come up with a plan which brings them rewards from every perspective – and will leave the Serbs without leadership as well as undermine international support for Serbia", says Taylor.

- "The elections are coming and Kosovo is an important question for all sides. If they close that question by closing the borders, deploy the Albanians and maintain KFOR reinforcements at customs, there is no Serbian politician who can win with a campaign of fighting against NATO. Serbs might be somewhat self-destructive, but not to that extent. That's why they want to finish this quickly. Going into the enclaves, one by one, is a long process. If they eliminate Mitrovica, the Serb enclaves are finished, because they will shrivel up and die."

- "In Kosovo the situation is such that nobody knows who is in charge. UNMIK is practically finished, it has no mission any more because its assignment is to enforce Resolution 1244, and that no longer exists. KFOR having entered with the task of protecting the UN and Resolution 1244 has converted into the protection force of an independent Kosovo. The German NATO soldier with whom I spoke, and who is in his third tour in Kosovo, says that NATO will securely remove itself from Kosovo only after a another ten years at a minimum, because there is still no progress. Eulex has the manpower, but wants the area cleaned up before it take over."

- "The reason for these elections is that Kosovo should remain part of Serbia. The Americans know that if the Serbian electorate shows that nationalism is alive and well, taking away something from somebody will only make that person even more determined. Therefore, they are counting on the window they have from Election Day until June or September, that is, until a strong enough government has been formed to take over this action in the UN. They have the whole summer to take care of such a "cleansing action". Russia is an unknown quantity to them, because if she commits the same kind of act as at Pristina airport (in 1999), it could take them out of the equation. Even now we have countries that recognize, those who do not recognize and those that are undecided about Kosovo. That, to Americans, Germans and the British, is a problem because they are in the minority in a big world. The Muslim world has not accepted their entanglement in Kosovo, and next to every Kosovo flag is the American flag. How would the Arabs, who so hate the "great Satan," like the creation of this American satellite? Even the Albanians won't disassociate themselves from the U.S. -- on the hotel in the middle of Pristina is a replica of the Statue of Liberty.

The brain behind this operation is the same man who planned March 17th. The goal of that attack was to test the Serbs, in order to better plan strategy for the final takeover of Mitrovica and crushing of the Serbian struggle in the whole of Kosovo and Metohija."

- "Everyone now looks toward the battlefield of Mitrovica, what the Serbs can do, whether they will offer a fight and how far they will go, what are their chances? NATO-- that is, the Americans--lead the project, but Larry Wilson of UNMIK's police is the ringleader. He was an assistant then head of the operation, and now he is the "boss." Seventeenth of March was his plan, and now he's come up with a new one. To support my words, I have the Galluci document, which describes the old tactics of counting arms: you commit a small attack and you see where the guns are. Then you develop a plan. That is how they provoked the Serbs, tested them, and now they know how long it will take them to react, how many people they can get out into the streets, what they are prepared to do and then they know what to expect. But the attack is likely during the next few days or weeks."

Do you have evidence that UNMIK and NATO are actively and consciously creating a Greater Albania?

- "We hear about it, but every official in the world will cover his ears and say that he knows nothing about a Greater Albania. However, when you look around in Kosovo, you can see that every flag is Albanian. Very few represent Kosovo, and even then, next to them are much bigger Albanian ones. It is very clear what is going on and the Albanians, themselves, have never lied about their intentions, just as they now proclaim their plans for southern Serbia and Macedonia. Their leaders have made agreements with the Americans, and our sources have confirmed to us that Hashim Thaci, together with the regional leadership, including Alija Ahmatija in Macedonia, was convinced at a meeting with the Americans would give NATO a chance. That is how they came to agree that the Albanians should keep a low profile, and that NATO would take over control of the borders. Everything that I have now seen in Kosovo supports this story and the work that NATO has done as its part of the bargain."

Essentially, Mitrovica is the main test for the creation of a Greater Albania -- that is the fall of the whole province?

- "I hope that there won't be any fatalities, but there will certainly be a big attack, because they cannot throw the Serbs out of Mitrovica unless they conquer them. A big test is coming – if Mitrovica falls, the enclaves fall with it.

That would then be the northern border of Kosovo, and the southern border would, in fact, no longer exist as such, because the way would already be opened to a Greater Albania?

- I have seen that the southern border (to Albania) does not exist, that it's completely open. I went down to the place where one should be able to see it (the border), but KFOR, who should be acting as border police behave like traffic conductors, just as one of them a German, joked, himself. He says that every vehicle goes through freely, and their only concern is to avoid traffic congestion. The roads are open wide, drugs pass through freely. We were in Albanian villages, in Korcus, for example, where we were unsuccessful in trying to find any kind of border limit. There is nothing, no line, no fence, nothing, just one German soldier who went to the place where there should be a border gestured in plain air where the border (Kosovo's border with Albania) should be."

What did the Gorani (Slvic Muslims) say? Are they loyal citizen of the southernmost tip of Serbia or are they in the middle part of a Greater Albania? How does UNMIK treat them?

- "Yes, loyal to Serbia and they get their pensions from Belgrade, but it is obvious that Kosovo and Albania are one country. Albanians, from Albania mind you, not only steal their stock from Kosovo, cows, horses, and what is very significant, they freely cut forests. If Kosovo regarded Albania as an adjoining country, not the same country, they would protect their resources, but I saw for myself that the Albanians have no problem freely taking the Gorani's forests and in destroying the region. It tells me that this is Greater Albania. NATO knows what is happening and they said that they have vehicles that can go up hills where they can see those that steal well enough to see the color of their eyes. We could stop this, but nobody will – that's what they told me. NATO, if it wanted, could but it cannot act independently of Kosovo's parliament -- that is, the Albanian leadership. Everybody knows there are no borders, but nobody will close them. We have the same information in secret documents we have received from our sources in UNMIK."

Are there Russian volunteers such as the Albanian media writes about? Are there Albanian "volunteers?" How do these fit into the plan for Mitrovica?

- "There are no Russian volunteers, but NATO needs provocations in order to create an attack and that is why on the Albanian side we have the coming together of "undesirables." In the past there were extremists on both sides, and I believe that the Albanian paramilitary formations were started in opposition to the enclaves should the Serbs in Mitrovica form a resistance. But I think that that would work against NATO's strategy and that the world would see through this – if the media showed the truth. But NATO will renew its principle with which it succeeded on 17th of March when one Ukrainian died, and another 63 from NATO were injured. That was shown immediately, but the violence against Serbs was not shown. Even now the focus will stay on Mitrovica and on the Serbs who throw stones."

The international community has easily accepted what UNMIK and NATO did to the Serbs on the 17th of March. Will the same deceit succeed in the case of a larger attack?

- "That day they tested the world community. Attacking Serbs did not touch many hearts and the sympathy was entirely with the wounded NATO soldiers. They now know that they can do, and will do it again.

You say that NATO is in a hurry to seal the "blitzkrieg" on Mitrovica. If they run into unexpected problems, it could become prolonged? You, yourself, say that the Russians are inclined to spoil their plans.

- Well, Russia maintains the strong position that only 34 countries have recognized Kosovo, and the rest have not. The general meeting of the UN is in September, and if NATO doesn't succeed now with its plans, there is a chance for Serbia that the talks will resume about the partitioning of Kosovo. It could hurt the U.S. position if Serbia brings up a cooperative resolution and shows that she still pays pensions to people in Kosovo…"

TGJ:"miserable pathetic losers".

Projecting again.

TGJ I can understand your irateness on 9 11. The US had worked so closely, and so well, with the Mujahideen in Kosovo, and then those Arabian rascals go and behave in such a rascally way.

The rascals.

No Christmas card for those Mujahideen tykes, that's for sure.

Watching "Rambo 3" must take on a whole new meaning after 9 11 mustn't it, TGJ. Is it still your fave movie of all time? Does it still rock?

Americans like Rambo. I know you love Soviet Communism, I for one thank God that Ronald Reagan brought the EVIL EMPIRE to its knees in Afghanistan and sent them retreating back to Russia, in humiliation and defeat. I know you foaming at the mouth Miloseviknik commies miss the soviet union, but your side lost, and then rest of the world rejoiced.

You lost Kosovo too, years ago, you are just too stupid to know it.

I think your knowledge of the Soviet Union with regards to Yugoslavia is........cough........a little suspect.

Here's a clue. The Warsaw Pact had detailed plans about invading Yugoslavia. the JNA spent most of it's time planning against such an eventuality.

So does "Rambo 3" still rock?

Just think, if Bin Laden hadn't turned on the US, you'd still be singing the Mujahideen's praises.

The mother of all blowbacks

The walking definition of a schmuck

"For the sake of disclosure, Scott Taylor receives money from Serbian groups in the USA and Canada where he does speaking tours from time to time, just like former Canadian general Lewis MacKenzie.

Still haven't forgiven Scott Taylor for reporting on the Medak Pocket, eh?

It's so predictable, someone differs from the MSM PR and then is automatically accused of "getting paid by Serbs" -- with absolutely no proof. If it weren't so pathetic on an ethical level, it would almost be funny.

"Hey, I know for a fact that he gets paid and gets gifts from the Serbs in places like Toronto, Hamilton, and Niagara Falls, Ontario. No different than when SerbNet paid Lewis MacKenzie to pimp for them.Just as much money I figure as Serbs paid David Binder of the New York Times and Nora Beloff of various British rags"

LOL! Page 145 of the Ruder Finn PR Firm Albo/Muslim/Croat plan for "discrediting the Serbs": "Say that any writer who varies from our anti-Serb party line is a paid propagandist -- and pretend it is a well-known fact"

That's your well-spent $$$ millions? What a transparent joke!

"But if it proves not true, then I suggest you examine your conscience before deciding to post similar stories in the future."

What is rather funny is that when I see an article that I thinks "lacks credibility" -- especially from an author or poster who I think "is prone to flight of fantasy" -- I don't waste my time on it or them. I might politely say, "This is nonsense & here's why", but then I move on.

You on the other hand have wasted posts after post contributing nothing to this thread other attacking the author as "drunk" and trying to discredit me as "spreading disinformation" and then attempting to intimidate me into "never posting something like this again".

In short, "Me thinks thou (and thy little crew, who are so pathetic that they actually think that you are "the-big-gun") doth protest (WAY) TOO MUCH" for you not to believe that both the author, the article and my arguments are "a serious threat" to you and your little zealot agenda.

Your wild-eyed attacks on Taylor, the article and and on me, show both that the article IS significant and that you are running scared.

Discovering "the truth" of and issue is hard work -- but "suppressing the truth" is ultimately impossible, so quit trying. "OK?"

"MacKenzie, Binder, and Beloff all admitted to getting money from Serbs."

Which is, in all likelihood, the truth!

MacKenzie, Beloff and Binder were all in the film, "Yugoslavia, an Avoidable War", based on Beloff's book of the same name. All of them -- McKenzie, Beloff and Binder -- were verbalizing their previously stated positions on the break-up of Yugoslavia for a commercial film. The director & producer was George Bogdanich, an American of Serb descent. So, yes, if you were to stretch the truth and warp it, you could say that they were "paid by Serbs" -- knowing full well that such a statement was deceptive and devious.

But there is a big difference between "paid by (American) Serbs" to state positions that they already repeatedly stated elsewhere -- verses being "bought by Serbia". There is absolutely no evidence of the latter.

MacKenzie, Binder and Beloff were not ever "media creations of Serbia" -- all had high-visibility careers with ample evidence that they held these balanced positions on the Yugoslav break-up long before any American of Serb descent paid their expenses to speak somewhere & be heard, or paid them to be in a commercial film (for which only a wealthy idiot would do for free).

Besides which, if you are honest, you know that none of these people could ever have been paid enough by American Serbs to endure the attacks on their reputations and character that they have suffered because of their refusal to toe the "anti-Serb party line". The only reason anyone would suffer the way that all of them have, endure it and keep pushing forward is because what they are saying is the truth!

I never stated that they were paid by those documentary makers. Feel free to look up MacKenzie and SerbNet when you have some free time. That's just for starters.

Serbian propaganda isn't the truth. For instance, recall that MacKenzie said that it'd take 500,000 soldiers to stop the war in Bosnia. Well, Radovan Karadzic himself stated in "Death of Yugoslavia" that it would have only taken 5,000 soldiers in Zvornik and 5,000 soldiers in the Corridor to end the war. Nevertheless, MacKenzie did a good job telling the world that a half million were needed.

How? What would they do with it - Blow up the whole of Kosovo? Having a limited nuclear weapons capability doesn’t prevent an attack or bolster your position. Take the Falklands. Argentina invaded the Falklands knowing full well that the UK was a nuclear power able to flatten every city in Argentina. Serbia would lose completely everything if it used a nuclear arsenal.

"I never stated that they were paid by those documentary makers. Feel free to look up MacKenzie and SerbNet when you have some free time."

I know who SerbNet is -- they are a group of Americans of Serbian descent in the Chicago area. If they paid MacKenzie for a speaking tour, so what? Americans had a right to hear the other side of this after the enormous amount of propaganda they had been subjected to by the the other side. Writer Roy Gutman made a big deal of this "SerbNet connection", because MacKenzie was challenging a version of the war that would have destroyed Gutman's phony "career accomplishments" for writing "award-winning stories" that had no basis in fact.

MacKenzie had already published a book on his experiences in Bosnia, and wasn't saying anything that he hadn't already said in his book.

"For instance, recall that MacKenzie said that it'd take 500,000 soldiers to stop the war in Bosnia. Well, Radovan Karadzic himself stated in "Death of Yugoslavia" that it would have only taken 5,000 soldiers in Zvornik and 5,000 soldiers in the Corridor to end the war."

Again, that's dishonest. There is a difference in timing between those two opinions on the who, what where and when it would have taken to end it.

I am surprised that you didn't bring up the "rape & murder of Muslim women allegations" against MacKenzie from which he was ultimately CLEARED --virtually all of which started circulating in the US AFTER MacKenzie testified before Congress that "the US should not get involved in the Balkans". NYT writer, John Burns, who had won a shared Pulitzer with Gutman for the phony Boris Herak story (the same source for the rape & murder allegations against MacKenzie) published these allegations as "fact", because his career was built on the same "sand" as the MacKenzie allegations.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.