Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shilling for Sharia at Harvard
FrontPage Magazine ^ | March 27, 2008 | Hillel Stavis

Posted on 03/30/2008 5:55:14 PM PDT by LSUfan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: shankbear
This guy is a nothing.

Whe nevertheless is teaching a generation of America's most influential lawyers. In a decade we'll see the Barack Obamas of that era speaking fondly in interviews of how Professor Feldman opened their eyes to "new perspectives in jurisprudence."

A disgrace.

41 posted on 03/30/2008 6:56:32 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
Then how do you rationalize disregarding large chunks of the torah?

What chunks of the Torah are you referring to? I am not aware of any chunks of the Torah being discarded by Orthodox Jews.

42 posted on 03/30/2008 7:00:01 PM PDT by Alouette (Vicious Babushka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
"I am not aware of any chunks of the Torah being discarded by Orthodox Jews."

I was unaware that Orthodox jews still sacrificed spotless lambs to atone for sin.

43 posted on 03/30/2008 7:01:44 PM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

honestly, I had no idea. I won’t claim to be a scholar of the Torah but if you can point me to a section specifically I’ll certainly get brushed up on that. Not that I plan to endorse slavery as a Jew just because its in the Torah...but I would be pretty hypocritical to condemn the active slavery of muslims if my own religion agrees.


44 posted on 03/30/2008 7:04:44 PM PDT by bpjam (Drill For Oil or Lose Your Job!! Vote Nov 3, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bpjam

See above where I quote Lev 25:44-46


45 posted on 03/30/2008 7:05:41 PM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

If you believe Leviticus is the word of G-d, then why would you suggest that even a single word of it is objectionable? If you don’t, then what do you believe in?


46 posted on 03/30/2008 7:07:03 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

What! I don’t believe in Aliens normally, but I think they have been here, and stole every bit of common sense from our college educators. These people have been drinking something like the Jim Jones KOOLAID. Sheesh!


47 posted on 03/30/2008 7:07:14 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

Sacrifices can only be brought in the Temple, which no longer exists. In the meantime, our prayers take the place of offerings until the Temple will be rebuilt.


48 posted on 03/30/2008 7:07:34 PM PDT by Alouette (Vicious Babushka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
"Sacrifices can only be brought in the Temple"

jews were performing sacrifices for 500 years before there was a temple. Have you even read the torah? The instructions for building a tabernacle are right there and nothing in the torah prohibits building one and following the law if there was any real desire to.

49 posted on 03/30/2008 7:11:06 PM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy
"If you believe Leviticus is the word of G-d, then why would you suggest that even a single word of it is objectionable?"

Because the law was replaced by the Messiah, Jesus Christ. The law was valid for its time, but it has been superceded.

50 posted on 03/30/2008 7:12:52 PM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

So you are saying that slavery was OK back then, but not now?


51 posted on 03/30/2008 7:20:04 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

After the Temple was built in Jerusalem, sacrifices could not be brought anywhere else. The laws of building the Tabernacle applied to the generations before the Temple was built.

In fact we honor the building of the Tabernacle through the laws of Sabbath, which are modeled to refrain from the 39 types of labor that were required to construct the Tabernacle.


52 posted on 03/30/2008 7:21:50 PM PDT by Alouette (Vicious Babushka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; 2ndDivisionVet; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; af_vet_rr; agrace; Aiko; ...
FReepMail to be added or removed from this pro-Israel/Judaic/Russian Jewry ping list.

Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.

53 posted on 03/30/2008 7:30:55 PM PDT by Alouette (Vicious Babushka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
attended the Orthodox Maimonides School near Boston

This guy Feldman completely freaked out and threw a public tantrum in the New York Times, cursing out his old school because they forgot to include a picture of him and his non-Jewish wife in their alumni newsletter.

54 posted on 03/30/2008 7:35:05 PM PDT by Alouette (Vicious Babushka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Feldman touched off a fierce debate when he recently wrote in The New York Times Magazine that Islamic Sharia law represents the highest state of "the rule of law."

That completely turns Feldman's article on its head.

If you bother to read it, Feldman is clearly not proposing or defending the superiority of Islamic law.

In fact his point was the opposite: after attempting to explain why at this point in time the concept of a Sharia-based society is attractive to many Muslims, he goes on to list the many philosophical, religious, legal and social difficulties of attempting to evolve Sharia law into a form that can work in modern society.

55 posted on 03/30/2008 7:39:31 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Considering our GOVT is satisfied with creating ISLAMIC constitutions (in Iraq & Afghanistan), after ISLAMIC terrorists tried to behead said govt, should this be surprising?


56 posted on 03/30/2008 7:44:30 PM PDT by PghBaldy (Obama disses his white grandma to lift up Wright. He is a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy
"So you are saying that slavery was OK back then, but not now?"

No, God says that.

57 posted on 03/30/2008 8:06:19 PM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

If Feldman thinks sharia is so hot, then he should go live under it.


58 posted on 03/30/2008 8:28:52 PM PDT by oyez (Justa' another high minded lowlife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

How do you know that He says that? Do you believe everything you read, or just the things that you like? Every extant text of the Torah was copied, ultimately, from earlier versions penned by Jewish scholars.

If Jewish scholars are fatally deficient and erring in their faith, how can you trust them to faithfully transmit His Word? Why do you trust each and every word of their written tradition, but absolutely none of their oral one? Were they a very peculiar type of liar that always wrote truly but always spoke falsely? Except when they started writing down their oral tradition, and then started writing falsely as well? That picture doesn’t make sense to me.


59 posted on 03/30/2008 8:33:17 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

Sharia is a cancer. The only way I’ll ever wear the abaya is if someone puts one on my cold dead body.


60 posted on 03/30/2008 8:38:12 PM PDT by JillValentine (Being a feminist is all about being a victim. Being an armed woman is all about not being a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson