The OP’s comments in post #1 are the issue here (again, not the content of article, just the OP’s own personal commentary). He sarcastically suggests that it is par for the course for LEOs to be ignorant, incompetent, and/or stupid with regard to the law.
I don’t see how anyone can read that any other way. Are people just not seeing what he wrote in post #1? That’s all I can think. At this point it doesn’t even matter if people agree or disagree with the sentiment expressed; the strange thing is people acting like his comments aren’t there and don’t mean what they say.
With more than 100 agents in the unit(prolly all of them, BTW) attending a mandatory refresher course on Ohio’s gun laws over the next couple of months.
He may have a valid point.
They do seem to not understand the law, as he stated.
Not the first time it has happened. Won’t be the last either.
It may not be par for the course, but it isn’t as rare as it should be either.
If you are getting payed to enforce the law, you darned better know it, or get used to paying for it.
Many people in this country are ignorant of the law. LEO's are captives of their training and their command philosophy.
Within that group is another group who enjoy brandishing their ignorance at the expense of the people who pay their salary and mean them no harm. I have posted several examples on this thread.
You can also use keyword "donutwatch" for some funny and not so funny examples posted to Free Republic.
Best regards,