Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pining_4_TX

Actually, when SS was conceived, the average lifespan was lower than the age at which the benefits kicked in. I think that paradigm should continue. The age of eligibility should be two years higher than the average lifespan.


11 posted on 03/26/2008 2:36:28 PM PDT by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy

Then they ought to stop calling it a kind of retirment system, and just call it what it is - income redistribution. If the people who have paid into SS for years, die before receiving much, if any, benefit, then it can hardly be called “social security”.

It’s just a colossal ripoff, like every other government program.


23 posted on 03/26/2008 6:14:22 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson