Supreme Court rules against illegal alien Death Row murderer; upholds US sovereignty

Michelle Malkin ^ | March 25, 2008 | Michelle Malkin

[indcons]

The original headline reads: "Breaking: Supreme Court rules against illegal alien Death Row murderer (and stupid Bush administration), upholds US sovereignty" (cropped to comply with FR's headline length rules).

Found this on Michelle Malkin's site. Did not see it posted here after a search.

[indcons]

"The decision, aside from its rebuff of presidential power, also treats the World Court ruling itself as not binding on U.S. states, when it contradicts those states’ criminal procedure rules."

[VeniVidiVici]

I find it hard to swallow that we should allow access to consular officials by those that are in our country illegally. That alone should terminate any rights they have as decreed by “international” law.

[TomGuy]

Excellent news.

[You can bet the phone lines between the Oval Office and Mexico City are burning.]

[indcons]

Ping

[TomGuy]

This is the best part:

Chief Justice John Roberts ... said

the international court decision cannot be forced upon the states.

[indcons]

Atzlan leader Juan Hernandez must be furious.

[AuntB]

“This is the best part:

Chief Justice John Roberts ... said
the international court decision cannot be forced upon the states.”

Indeed it is!

[Conservative Vermont Vet]

The president, was in the unusual in his usual "bent over" position was obviouslyand pandering to his good buds south of the border, going so far as to side with a murderous illegal alien thug, and against his own government and his home state

Hey Jorge, just how low will you stoop in your efforts towards open borders and shamnesty?

[jazusamo]

Excellent News!

[DoughtyOne]

It has been baffling to watch President Bush try to figure out which nation’s citizens elected him to be their president. He has sided with Mexican citizens over our own countless times.

Here a Mexican citizen had killed a Citizen of the United States, and Bush still defended him. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, he has backed illegal aliens as they declared open season on U.S. Citizens’s jobs and lives.

[ArrogantBustard]

phone lines between the Oval Office and Mexico City are burning.

TFS. If Senor El Presidente Calderon doesn't want his country's murderers dying in Texas prisons, perhaps he should take some steps to keep his country's citizens from ILLEGALLY entering these United States.

[nicmarlo]

The president may not “establish binding rules of decision that pre-empt contrary state law,” Roberts said.

BTTT!!

[Notwithstanding]

Who were three “yes” votes?

[Still Thinking]

Stevens, Ginburg, Breyer, maybe?

[Deo volente]

Supreme Court SMACKDOWN of the New World Order!

I love it!!

(I wonder if President Jorge W. is having a few regrets right now about nominating John Roberts.)

[romanesq]

What a brilliant and clear thinking Chief Justice we have!
Now who were the three asses who voted against American law?

[NinoFan]

No, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer dissented. Stevens concurred in the judgment only. He didn’t agree with the Chief Justice’s reasoning and said that there was much wisdom in Breyer’s dissent (lol).

[anita]

Hey Jorge, just how low will you stoop in your efforts towards open borders and shamnesty?

Come again? What has that to do with this ruling? And about the Ruling - why do you think it is anything against Bush? Do you honestly believe Bush favors ICC over our courts?

And then you seem to think Texas is against Bush too, right? Sometimes, being a President means adhere to some pressures, while working for the Results.

In the end, what all matters are Results. You would be surprised to know that Bushies will be the happiest over this ruling, but then they already were expecting that.

Some people will always blame Bush, for whatever happening anywhere.

[sit-rep]

by the world court’s rulings in such cases

The world court aye?