[SECURE AMERICA]

While certainly not a politically correct thing to say in America these days one that many many American citizen believe.
The sad part of this is I thought we had a 1st Amendment concerning freedom of speech.
But alas it seems that it is okay these day to speak on spreading the homosexual agenda but to speak against it will cause you to be attacked and destroyed.
So much for the Constitution............

[upsdriver]

But alas it seems that it is okay these day to speak on spreading the homosexual agenda but to speak against it will cause you to be attacked and destroyed. So much for the Constitution............

And that is just one reason why the homosexuals and their agenda is more damaging to America than the terrorists.

[Peter Libra]

The sad part of this is I thought we had a 1st Amendment concerning freedom of speech.

I would not have posted on this, but your mention of free speech struck a chord. My liberal spouse is the T/V watcher, myself the computer. I glanced up at the tube and saw something about this. I cannot remember whether it was on Sixty Minutes or CNN, maybe neither.

A presenter was a man with an impressive visage. He was a healthy forty years or so. He looked like a cross between Hugh Garner and Cary Grant. He had on a gentleman called Visconti.

He reads off what the lady had said about homosexuals. Then he veered on to Visconti. It seemed he had a touch of hysteria (just a tad) as he brought Visconti into the picture. I could not stand to watch and said to the figure on the screen

"Why don't you scream and hit someone with your purse?"

A low shot I will admit.(He could not hear). What I really should have said, before this rant is this. The lady only has her opinion. All she did is give her view.

If this is a crime, then trouble looms. It has loomed in Canada and we are paying a price.