Skip to comments.
Fort Drum Prints Photos After Arrests for D.W.I.
The NY Times ^
| March 8, 2008
| LISA W. FODERARO
Posted on 03/08/2008 10:40:22 AM PST by stentorian conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
To: Emperor Palpatine
We already tried that and Al Capone made millions.
61
posted on
03/08/2008 1:21:53 PM PST
by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: StolarStorm
Most states peg it at 0.01 or 0.02 for underage drivers since they are not allowed ANY drinks. This is to account for meds and error.
I think it should be either 0.02 or 0.10. Anything in between is just a ‘teaser’ to make people into criminals.
62
posted on
03/08/2008 1:26:52 PM PST
by
varyouga
("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
To: stentorian conservative; xzins
This might constitute command influence.
63
posted on
03/08/2008 1:29:35 PM PST
by
jude24
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: varyouga
In NY the limit is .08. But your right, two pints will put me dangerously close. However, making the limit 0 will only put more photos in the paper.
To: stentorian conservative
In NY the limit is .08 That's the problem. Nobody knows the new sneaky laws.
It's actually 0.05 for slightly lower fines and penalties. But they still take your license. A buddy of mine hit a checkpoint in NYC with a 0.06 (had 2-3 pints), lost thousands of dollars and his license for 3 months.
http://www.nydmv.state.ny.us/broch/c39.htm
65
posted on
03/08/2008 1:37:49 PM PST
by
varyouga
("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
To: MississippiMan
More money wont fix the drunk driving problem
I agree in general about more money not helping much, but NOT for our military forces. We need to realocate (not more) funds to solve this problem for them...solutions that fo NOT include public shaming for them and their families.
66
posted on
03/08/2008 1:45:25 PM PST
by
eleni121
(Solzhenitsyn on the bombing of Serbia: "no difference whatsoever between NATO and the Nazis")
To: varyouga
Nobody knows the new sneaky laws..
Except sneaky lawyers...Laws written by sneaky lawyers to benefit sneaky lawyers.
67
posted on
03/08/2008 1:46:54 PM PST
by
eleni121
(Solzhenitsyn on the bombing of Serbia: "no difference whatsoever between NATO and the Nazis")
To: bigfootbob
If the shaming were inflicted upon conviction I would agree with you. Shaming people due to suspicion (such as arrest, before adjudication) is not in line with the spirit or letter of american jurisprudence.
68
posted on
03/08/2008 1:49:38 PM PST
by
MortMan
(Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
To: varyouga
Words fail. I suppose I could quote Ayn Rand at this point, but it is becoming tiresome.
To: stentorian conservative
Isn't it wonderful how they sneaked it in so nobody knows about it until the handcuffs are on?
BTW, my friend spent 2 nights in NYC jail waiting to get booked next to all the gangbangers. He said that was far worse than the money and license lost.
70
posted on
03/08/2008 2:11:13 PM PST
by
varyouga
("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
To: jude24; P-Marlowe
command influence
You could be right. It could be construed as a commander signaling that he thinks someone is guilty, and that he wants a significant punishment.
If he waited to publish until after the legal/non-judicial/appeal proceedings were completed, then it probably would not be.
71
posted on
03/08/2008 4:21:18 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
To: stentorian conservative
Interesting. I didnt know you could demote someone to another corps. Learn something new everyday.I don't remember exactly how, but somehow I got snagged with the duty of being bailiff at his courtmartial. To this day I'm not quite sure how since I had nothing to do with JAG *although* the major was from the HQ Co in my battalion. It was...interesting.
72
posted on
03/08/2008 11:54:19 PM PST
by
VeniVidiVici
(Benedict Arnold was against the Terrorist Surveillance Program)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson