To: Jim Robinson
I don't know how much more "religious" NR could have been. In fact, it was extremely religious, unless the author objects to Roman Catholicism.
My statement to the author would be, "You are criticizing, but offering nothing concrete, just sand castles in the sky."
My question would be, "Just how would conservatism have been built along the lines you prescribe? What do you want?"
3 posted on
03/03/2008 2:04:55 PM PST by
jammer
To: jammer
unless the author objects to Roman CatholicismDing ding ding. We have a winner.
6 posted on
03/03/2008 2:06:30 PM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: jammer
My question would be, "Just how would conservatism have been built along the lines you prescribe? What do you want?" Let's cut through the code language.
The author wants the Mackerel-Snapping Papists thrown out.
7 posted on
03/03/2008 2:07:34 PM PST by
steve-b
(Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
To: jammer
I don't know how much more "religious" NR could have been. In fact, it was extremely religious, unless the author objects to Roman Catholicism. Touche.'
37 posted on
03/03/2008 2:28:31 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: jammer
following God’s Word does not include a loud Proclamation of doing so - whether personally or politically.
66 posted on
03/03/2008 2:42:56 PM PST by
bioqubit
To: jammer
Anti Catholicism. The one true bigotry on which the Left and large elements of the Right can always agree.
To: jammer
In fact, it was extremely religious, unless the author objects to Roman Catholicism. You broke the code.
135 posted on
03/04/2008 4:28:29 AM PST by
Ditto
(Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson