Barack Hussein Obama, Jr

Gather ^ | February 29, 2008 | Juan J Martinez

[Jim Robinson]

Yup, they’ve always use middle names. Examples, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Dwight David Eisenhower, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, George Herbert Walker Bush. Of course, more recently we’ve had Dubya Bush, John Benedict Arnold McCain and John F’n Kerry. Not a thing wrong with using full names.

[Ron H.]

The skunk media is erecting a shield around the messiah. ...

 

[Fred Nerks]

“...Obama served on the Wood’s Fund board alongside William C. Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971...”

Thanks Eye On The Left for posting the article by David Horowitz:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1978398/posts?q=1&;page=51

[Kryptonite]

Wonder how Dubya feels about this.

[Kryptonite]

James Danforth Quayle

George Walker Bush, i.e, DUBYA

John Walker Lindh

Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

Coming home to roost. Booyah.

[Kryptonite]

Richard Milhous Nixon. John Quincy Adams. William Jefferson Clintoon.

[Sicario]

Right on

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Time for my link to :

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left
(Paperback) by David Horowitz (Author)

*******************

an a review:

505 of 597 people found the following review helpful:

Vastly Illuminating, September 25, 2004

By	Kat Bakhu (Albuquerque, NM United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left (Hardcover)

I had long wondered why people on the Left had the propensity to speak more positively about people who would slit their throats than they do about their own country, which affords them more freedom and opportunity than anywhere else. David Horowitz has answered that question thoroughly and convincingly in his Unholy Alliance. Where I felt bewildered and confused, I now feel crystal clear. Unholy Alliance is such a great book.

It begins with the leftist movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and works its way up to the present day, exploring the anti-American attitude of these movements in detail. Horowitz shows that the enemies of the US back then are largely the same group today, operating under the same misperceptions, making the same mistakes, and pursuing the same impossible utopia.

Individual chapters are included on the Patriot Act (I was persuaded that it is a GOOD thing); the democratic flip-flop on Iraq once G.W. Bush implemented what they agreed with Clinton needed to be done; the driving components of the current anti-war movement; as well as chapters on individual personalities who are major spokespeople of the Left. Horowitz covers a lot of ground, and he covers it concisely and clearly. Unholy Alliance is richly informative without ever being boring or plodding.

This book is so illuminating that I simply cannot do justice to it here. I love people who reason so clearly that they help me get my own reasoning clear. Horowitz is just that type of person! In the terrain of mindless clichés (no-blood-for-oil, etc.), he is a breath of real fresh air.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

I just posted this article from the Los Angeles Times:

Homing in on security as Obama's weakness

Has links to Hillarys new campaign ad ...

[Tex Pete]

[Syncro]

As Rush pointed out on The Ingraham Factor (the only time I can watch the usually spin zone) last nite that it is the democrats that first brought up Hussein's Muslim name.

They used it first, and now blame it on conservatives.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Fred Nerks and Ernest at the Beach for the pings etc.