Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton offers child poverty plan
AP on Yahoo ^ | 2/28/08 | Mike Glover - ap

Posted on 02/28/2008 9:57:19 PM PST by NormsRevenge

HANGING ROCK, Ohio - Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton offered a plan to improve childhood nutrition and set a goal to reduce by half the 12 million youngsters living in poverty over the next dozen years.

The package of proposals includes a "comprehensive" early education initiative that starts with nurse's visits for pregnant women, lets children begin the Head Start program earlier and calls for universal pre-kindergarten programs.

The New York senator also says she would deal with childhood hunger by putting in place a food safety net, and give children "greater access to healthy, fresh food."

She spelled out her proposals in a speech Thursday at the child care development center on Ohio University's southern campus, and toured a Head Start program serving economically challenged southern Ohio. It was part of her effort to focus the Democratic campaign on bedrock economic issues.

"You should have a president again who actually gets up thinking about you every day," Clinton told about 200 people at the event. "I have spent a lifetime working to help children, which is my first passion. If our children get off to a good start so much of the other stuff is taken care of."

Clinton aides said the new programs would carry an annual pricetag of $5 billion to $6 billion. A significant portion of her plan comes by expanding existing programs. She would cover the cost by toughening tax enforcement to collect money currently owed but not paid.

Clinton said she would direct her agriculture secretary to develop a plan to end childhood hunger. The nutrition effort would come largely through signing up more people for the food stamp program and expanding its benefits. She argued her program is comprehensive, dealing with both parents and children.

"We have to focus on children and families, it has to go hand in hand," said Clinton. She heard stories from women struggling to raise children and get by financially.

"I have to say I don't know how single moms do it," said Clinton.

Clinton argues that roughly 12.9 million children live in poverty, with about 5 million living in extreme poverty. That means their families have incomes of less than half the federal poverty level.

School breakfast programs would be universal in low-income neighborhoods under her proposal. She also would double the size of a summer nutrition program aimed at feeding low-income children when they aren't in school.

Clinton also says she would launch an effort to get junk food out of schools. She would require schools that get federal funding through the school lunch or breakfast programs to offer only food that meets or surpasses USDA standards.

Heading to her child poverty event, Clinton stopped at a mobile home in Pomeroy for a roundtable discussion of the problems facing families in a county where the poverty rate is near 20 percent, almost double the national average. Much of her focus was on health care, but she was quick to draw a distinction with rival Barack Obama.

Roger Holman, a state worker, said he was worried that forcing people to buy health insurance would be hard on those struggling to get by. Clinton jumped on that saying Obama is distorting her proposal.

"That's misleading," she said. "That's not at all what's going to happen."

Clinton told the nine people gathered that her plan is superior because it would cover everyone, while Obama would leave out 15 million.

"That won't work," said Clinton. "Everybody's got to be in the system."

Later, Clinton later to Houston, where she spelled out her ambitious energy plan to polite applause from about 1,000 people attending a business conference.

Clinton said she favors speeding development of a replacement for the soon-to-be-retired space shuttle and claimed "important differences" with "my opponent with respect to the next generation of vehicles for space flight."

She also laid out the details of her energy plan, which emphasizes reducing U.S. reliance on oil. "It's time for the oil companies to become energy companies," she said. "I do not believe that now is the time that subsidies for oil companies are necessary or appropriate."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: child; clinton; cradletograve; hillary; nannystate; nogoodmarxistcnt; poverty; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Clinton offers child poverty plan

Tax 'em so much they can't help but be poor.

21 posted on 02/28/2008 10:29:43 PM PST by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
Oh gosh, I forgot the “Hillary is Bill without the Weiner” vote. Even with that, she still loses.
The Cackle vote can’t even save her.
22 posted on 02/28/2008 10:30:51 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (Guns don't kill people, gun free zones kill people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
These programs haven’t even been added to Hillary Spending Meter which is up to $888 billion.

http://www.gop.com/spendometer.htm

23 posted on 02/28/2008 10:34:30 PM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The stupid witch is offering to pick our pockets with another socialist program.
24 posted on 02/28/2008 10:37:03 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

there she goes again. gotta love that part about tougher IRS enforcement. That will work wonders in the general. /sarc

the real story is that this is the kind of specific “I care and I’ll fight for you” plan that may get democrats to vote for her over Oh! bummer.


25 posted on 02/28/2008 10:41:03 PM PST by ari-freedom (Thank you Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; wagglebee; neverdem; backtothestreets
Hillary Rodham Clinton offered a plan to improve childhood nutrition and set a goal to reduce by half the 12 million youngsters living in poverty over the next dozen years.

The 'living in poverty' schick is a fraud. Many who are relatively low-income are not at all 'impoverished.'

GET OUT OF OUR WALLETS AND LET THEM SET THEIR OWN GOALS, Evillary! The local communities will pitch in where needed to cover any gaps.
26 posted on 02/28/2008 10:46:59 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

Didn’t Johnson do this same thing about 45 years ago? Did his program not work? Hey! Wait a minute...


27 posted on 02/28/2008 10:59:04 PM PST by chadwimc (Proud to be an infidel ! Allah fubar !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"'That won't work,' said Clinton. 'Everybody's got to be in the system.'"

She'll have your number (everyone), and she'll have your children. See Waco for what she would do to your house to get them. ;-)
28 posted on 02/28/2008 11:02:53 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), '89-'96)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"You should have a president again who actually gets up thinking about you every day," Clinton told about 200 people at the event. "I have spent a lifetime working to help children, which is my first passion. If our children get off to a good start so much of the other stuff is taken care of."

Her brain must hurt, waking up and thinking about all 300 million of us at the same time.

As for her remarks, if I were a parent, I would be deeply insulted. Hillary's comments imply that all American parents are inept when it comes to child rearing and that only the government is capable of the task at hand.

29 posted on 02/28/2008 11:33:30 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Admin Moderator for President. The lesser of two evils is still evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunner03
Not content to cover all from the womb to the tomb, as O’man wants, Hil want to cover all from the erection to the resurrection.

The irony is that the liberals don't consider individuals present the stage from between the erection and the birth to actually be alive, hence their support for abortion on demand.

30 posted on 02/28/2008 11:34:59 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Admin Moderator for President. The lesser of two evils is still evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
What they say: “We will take from you for the common good”.

What they do: They take from all of us for their (and only their) good. Then they turn around and sell us down the river to our enemies.

31 posted on 02/28/2008 11:35:42 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Admin Moderator for President. The lesser of two evils is still evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
These programs haven’t even been added to Hillary Spending Meter which is up to $888 billion.


32 posted on 02/28/2008 11:36:57 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Admin Moderator for President. The lesser of two evils is still evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Your parents will taste like chicken...


33 posted on 02/28/2008 11:37:38 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"I have to say I don't know how single moms do it" said Clinton.

But yet she has a solution.

34 posted on 02/28/2008 11:39:37 PM PST by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

At a quick glance, it almost looks like she’s pointing at Willy’s willy and laughing. ;)


35 posted on 02/28/2008 11:44:20 PM PST by CountryBumpkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
You should have a president again who actually gets up thinking about you every day," Clinton told about 200 people at the event.

200 people ? and 150 of those were media

36 posted on 02/28/2008 11:55:12 PM PST by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Actually, no, I sure do not want a President who wakes up thinking about THOSE 200 people every day — I want a President whose first priority is upon defeating our ENEMIES overseas, and whose other priorities are focused upon a more rational, limited government that is nothing what the Hildebeast wants to continue to metastasize. It is pandering to the silliest kind of liberal narcissism to tell an audience that our President should be thinking about THEM every morning!!!! Now let’s call Shrillary the Panderbeast.....


37 posted on 02/29/2008 12:19:00 AM PST by Enchante (Obama: I'll eagerly kiss Castro's cold dead ass, that's my foreign policy!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

“Obama still pulls it out with the adoring ignorant voters.”

Her husband could charm those voters, but she can’t. End of story for Hitlery for President.


38 posted on 02/29/2008 12:52:49 AM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Yes, let’s keep rewarding people who have children without benefit of marriage by taking from the families who do the right thing. That’ll turn the country around.


39 posted on 02/29/2008 1:21:24 AM PST by informavoracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Clinton offers child poverty plan

They already have a "Child Poverty Plan", it's called "punitive taxation". It guarantees that I'll never fully realize the true potential of my income that much of it will be routed away from my family towards non-accountable nor deserving entities as design by socialist tyrants.

To hell with all of them.

40 posted on 02/29/2008 1:24:37 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson