——IMHO, if she had asthma since she was 2 years old she had ample opportunity to learn to “try” to maintain and minimize any attacks. I find it hard to believe with over 16 years experience with asthma she was never informed of any, or all, potential triggers and to do her utmost to avoid them. The article alludes to her inability to control the disease but stops there. There is a reason they did not expand on that comment or mention any personal identiers. This researcher has found a case to justify his research based on his political agenda.——
I agree. If no toxicology studies were done on her then how is it possible to blame cigarette smoke as the culprit when it may have been some perfume someone was wearing, or many other things in her environment that could trigger such a reaction. Perhaps the cumulative exposure to numerous triggers finally sent her over the edge.
I also think its more likely that he found another case that DETERMINES his political agenda(with our tax dollars).
“I also think its more likely that he found another case that DETERMINES his political agenda(with our tax dollars).”
Exactly. The whole article is written BASED on his research. He is the ONLY person cited throughout it, and he just happens to have a new article published (based on said research) and appears to be a grant-hungry persona.