Posted on 02/08/2008 4:46:22 PM PST by Mobile Vulgus
“You plankton!...”...I’m sorry..
I’m still LOL ROFLMAO
Where are you? South Pacific?
Gulf of Mexico? An aquarium in Kansas City?
Chelsea plastic surgery rumors are abound.
Before & after pics
http://cosmetic-makeovers.com/2007/10/31/plastic-surgery-for-chelsea-clinton
I don't know how Olberman gets away with his hate speech every night. They love him so much at MSNBC that he usually gets to anchor election coverage for hours.
All the vile words they have called our President in the past 8 years and that is OK.
Actually, the Founders only considered political speech to be covered by the “freedom of speech” phraseology. The Founders never meant to cover just any speech at all. In fact, every single colony had speech codes and it has only been in the 20th century that “freedom of speech” was enlarged to cover all speech.
Originally, the Founders wanted to cover political speech so that we would have a free and open democracy that is controlled by the people and one where the government could not clamp down on the open expression of new political parties, groups, and advocates.
And, the Constitution was already ratified by the states way before the Amendments (including the Bill of Rights) was instituted. Many states said they ratified contingent upon the Bill of Rights being added later. But, it was still ratified, nonetheless. So, conceivably, we could have had the Constitution without the Bill of Rights ever coming about. After all, it was already done.
Agree completely. Besides that, this was also a shot across the media's bow to remind the MSM who's boss. There's a chance it might ultimately backfire if the journos begin to resent chafing on her leash, but for now she has them cowed.
Originally, the Founders wanted to cover political speech so that we would have a free and open democracy that is controlled by the people and one where the government could not clamp down on the open expression of new political parties, groups, and advocates.
And, the Constitution was already ratified by the states way before the Amendments (including the Bill of Rights) was instituted. Many states said they ratified contingent upon the Bill of Rights being added later. But, it was still ratified, nonetheless. So, conceivably, we could have had the Constitution without the Bill of Rights ever coming about. After all, it was already done.
Thanks, MV.
No Problem
So is Paula Jones and Jennifer Flowers.
And let’s not forget that Vince Foster was someone’s son.
I hope everyone digested what you posted.
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.