To: jim_trent
"Its sometimes argued that bear arms has a specifically military meaning, so keep should be read as similarly limited."What's wrong with being consistent? "To keep" meant "to upkeep" -- to maintain in good working order.
Individuals were to maintain their own weapons and bear them into battle. Nothing awkward about that interpretation.
To: robertpaulsen
robertpaulsen said:
"Nothing awkward about that interpretation." Nothing except that the meaning of "keep" is not the same as the meaning of "keep up" or "upkeep".
There are those on the present Court who might try to narrow the common meaning of the word "keep", so keep coming up with these ideas. We need to keep the liberals on the Court supplied with good ideas.
21 posted on
02/01/2008 10:48:56 AM PST by
William Tell
(RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
To: robertpaulsen
"To keep" meant "to upkeep" Stop lying. Everyone is tired of it.
56 posted on
02/01/2008 12:57:00 PM PST by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson