Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale

This is simply one group attempting to grab exclusive use of public lands for their activities. The enviro-jihadists are on the march or should I say hike. In Colorado they have banned 4-wheeling in many formally popular places, now bikes. These Sierra Club type hikers are spoiled brats that don’t know how to share. BLM and national forest lands are to be multi-use, sometimes that includes mining, ranching, recreation, hunting, biking, motor-sports, climbing, timber harvesting and even hiking. If they are to be exclusively used by any one interest then the land is essentially as if it were private. In that case the land should be sold to the highest bidder - in the mean time I suggest that the Sierra Club fork over the equivalent property tax for all the public land they think they own (a couple of billion dollars would come close).


15 posted on 01/23/2008 10:21:10 AM PST by DaveyB (Ignorance is part of the human condition - atheism makes it permanent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: DaveyB

As far as I am concerned there should be no such thing as public land. Not even public easements. 1% of Alaska is in private ownership, which is what drew my attention to this abuse of ownership.


17 posted on 01/23/2008 10:24:20 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson