When the TITLE of the thread is “Huck Gets Tough on Immigration”, I believe that Huck getting tough on immigration is going to be the topic of discussion.
If Neal wanted us to discuss HIS plan, he shouldn’t have put it in an article called “Huck gets tough”, because it falsely implies that the plan has some relationship to Huck’s positions, when in fact Huckabee has specifically denounced at least one major step in Neal’s plan, and has acted contrary to at least one other major step.
Well, Neal is only human, and subject to making mistakes, like assuming that the readers would be smart enough to read the article and figure out that its main thrust was his idea about how to solve the illegal immigration problem; not Huckabee.
Obviously, he was wrong -- it appears that it's more fun to chew the cud about a crooked politician than it is to discuss a relatively simple idea about the problem.