Posted on 01/15/2008 7:43:41 PM PST by Stoat
Send over a case of wine.
What goes well with whale?
Send over a case of wine.
What goes well with whale?
LMAO!
I'm not sure that anything does....
An amusing (at least to me) related item that may be of interest is that here in Washington State, the Makah Indians were in the news back in the late 1990's because they wanted to revive whaling as a tradition for their community. The screaming hysteria in the press and the courts was deafening, seemingly for years, until 1999 when they finally got clearance to do this. It took quite a while for them to actually get one, in large measure because whenever they would go out in the longboats there would be a flotilla of Greenpeace hippies shadowing them, shouting and screaming and racing about and doing everything they could to harass the Makahs as well as any whales in the vicinity. Well, they finally got one, harpooned and then shot dead with a .50 cal. rifle. They dragged it up onto the beach and had a huge production over the cleaning and cooking of the meat, but when it came down to the locals actually eating it there were few takers and all of the TV interviews that I saw at the time showed local indians turning up their noses in disgust after one timid bite and throwing the rest away.
I'm told that for weeks thereafter there were huge billboards advertising "whale meat dinners" at the casinos in the area, but I also understand that there were few takers.
I guess it's an 'acquired taste' that's difficult to become enthusiastic about when you've got a McDonald's and a Kentucky Fried Chicken and a Wendy's right down the street.
Whales are warm-blooded mamals, and as such would probably be considered "red meat".
Therefore, I am thinking grilled on the barby, like a steak.
Or slow-roasted, like prime rib.
It would be interesting, at least if one did not end up with 10 tons of leftovers.
kaizoku!
My recollection is that they were grilling it on the beach after they killed it, but I’m not sure what they did with it in the casino restaurants.
It seems to me that the whole exercise could have been avoided by a little bit of research beforehand. Perhaps a plane trip to Japan to chat with some of the chefs there might have been a thought? The whole thing was a media-frenzy mess from start to finish, and it seems that it wasn’t really thought through very well.
No way man, we can just go to the past to get more.
"Gaia, the final frontier. These are the voyages of the Starship Collectivism. It's five-year plan: To explore strange new climate change theories. To seek out endangered life, and stifle new civilization. To baldly lie where no man has lied but Gore!"
Australia to Pick Up Whaling Activists
(excerpt) The protesters from the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society scored a victory with their stunt, bringing Japan's whale hunt to a standstill while officials scrambled to resolve the faceoff. The Australian customs ship Oceanic Viking will pick up the two activists, an Australian and a Briton, and return them to their anti-whaling vessel as soon as the details can be arranged, Foreign Minister Stephen Smith said. The offer came at the request of the Japanese government, and the head of the activist group said he agreed to the transfer as long as there were no conditions requiring him to stop harassing the whalers.
I presume you’ve seen the updates. If not, see my post and link at #167. You’re quite right that it’s being handled as a “Customs and Fisheries exercise”, and it appears that a Customs ship is about to aid to abet the activities of the Sea Shepherd group, with the full support of the Australian government. Go Aussies!
Thanks for the clarification.
I have no doubt at all that this is precisely what it means to you, however it appears that the Australian Government is not quite so depraved as what you take them to be. From a far more reputable and balanced Australian news source:
Canberra casts off whaling activists NEWS.com.au
THE Australian Government has condemned the actions of the rogue activists who boarded a Japanese whaling ship in the Southern Ocean, as federal police examined whether they could be prosecuted.
(edit)
Mr Smith said the incident was being "evaluated" by the Australian Federal Police.
(end edit)
I think that many here will find it quite telling that in your giddiness and jubilation at the notion of these scummy violent hippie terrorists being released, your default source for information on it is America's Pravda, the endlessly-discredited New York Slimes which is losing readership as a sieve loses water precisely because of it's increasingly shoddy 'reporting' and blatant leftwing bias. As is the NYT's ongoing pattern of bias, they omit crucial details in their version of this story in order to spin the story to appeal to it's leftwing readership. This story is being carried on over a thousand major sites, and this is the one that you choose.
Also quite telling is the fact that the Sea Shepherd people are so violent, imbalanced and hysterical that even the normally hard-Left Greenpeace hippies reject them. From the article:
Mr Watson was a co-founder of Greenpeace before he split with the organisation in 1977 to pursue more radical action against whaling.
"We are there to defend the whales, not to attack whalers," Mr Nicholl said.
This matter is far from being over.
You’re ignoring the bottom line. From the article you linked to: “Mr Smith said the Oceanic Viking would be used as a neutral platform to return the two activists to their own ship, the Steve Irwin.” This hardly sounds like the Australian government is interested in stopping them. They can “evaluate” all they like, but actions are what counts. If they didn’t want the Sea Shepherders to carry on, they’d take them onto the customs ship and bring them to Australian soil, to await the conclusions of the legal authorities’ “evaluations”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.