Replies

He was for McCain last time, and now he was an undecided. Did he actually end up for Romney at the end?

Both debates were in New Hampshire, so it’s not like they brought him in from another state.

If he was articulate in the first focus group, and was undecided, Luntz would bring him back.

Actually, you're right. I didn't watch the video before I posted that, but, rather, took another poster's word on its face. I don't usually do that, and this is why.

I never believed he was a "plant", per se, though I was, and still am, suspicious that anyone would be willing to maintain that they are "undecided" if it meant getting on TV and, perhaps, helping their preferred candidate. This is especially likely considering that the focus group is self-selected; they sign up on his website. The way many of the focus group members parrot various positive and negative talking points floating around about the candidates (Fred "looks old", Mitt is "too slick") calls their neutrality into serious question in my mind.

I can't speak for many other Fred supporters, but I've never put a great deal of stock in Frank Luntz, his methodology, or his focus groups. They can be informative, but only when the points they make are well-reasoned, or when they seem truly spontaneous. I have not, however, thought their responses were ever truly representative of the "average voter".