Fred hasn’t distinguished himself, are you kidding me??? Could he be any more diferent from those he is running against???
Please, pundits of the world, if you’re going to take the time to write about Fred, do him the favor of listening to what he is saying first.
Posted by: DJ | Jan 5, 2008 3:25:10 PM
agree joel, every man and woman in SC should take a look at fred08.com.
There is nobody in the race thats more consistantly conservative than Fred Thompson, period..
Take a look for yourself South Carolina, I’m sure you’ll agree,
Immigration, Right to Life, Terrorism, National Defense, Social Security, etc...
Go Fred!!
Posted by: stlpatriot | Jan 5, 2008 3:27:08 PM
Let’s get one thing straight....Fred is not dropping out! I sent him a little money to let him know we are still backing him all the way, this after the Iowa caucus. Some have it right (not you) that McCain should drop and support Fred which will never happen but it would be a good gesture on a man’s part that wakes up each day and flips a coin to see if he is liberal or conservative for that day....I will stay with Fred as long as he stays in the race.
Posted by: Dick | Jan 5, 2008 3:38:35 PM
I agree with you, Brad. I like Fred a lot, but he has no chance to win this thing. I like him because he is a man of principle who truley loves his country. I believe he ran because he felt he could take the place of Sen. McCain, had his summer slump continued. It did not, he’s back. Sen. Thompson needs to step back and re-evaluate what is best for his country. If McCain was put in the same position, I think he would drop out. As times would have it, he is the current favorite for the nomination. Fred is behind Ron Paul. (I base this off intrade.com). We love you Fred, but we do so because you make choices for the good of the country, not for your own personal ambition.
Posted by: Rob | Jan 5, 2008 3:52:52 PM
> until Sam Brownback gracefully departed from the race
That may be the most ridiculous statement I’ve ever read on this blog. You’re making some sort of assumption that Brownback would have somehow split the 39% of the Iowa vote that Huckabee got? Hilarious. Brownback dropped out because he would have finished in 9th place in Iowa had he stayed in. Zero name recognition combined with zero personality results in zero percent of the vote.
Posted by: Doug | Jan 5, 2008 4:11:39 PM
....If McCain was put in the same position, I think he would drop out...
HA!
McCain was in a much worse position a few months ago when he pleaded for support for the McCain-Kennedy-Bush amnesty plan they tried to ramrod down our throats. McCain is back in the race only because people have forgotten (for now) what he did. His current denials of his support for amnesty might get him some short-term support, but will eventually serve as fodder for any opponent that wishes to expose his mendacity.
Fred did pretty good in IA considering his relatively late start and the compressed time-frame that prevented the social conservatives from really getting to know Huckabee.
Fred will pull support from Huck first. All the other Republican candidates are regarded as liberal. Huck’s foolish followers think he is a conservative, like Fred is in fact, and they should switch to Fred if they really believe in the principles that Huck pretends to support.
Posted by: Allan Stewart | Jan 5, 2008 4:17:59 PM
Wrong. Fred and John may be friends, but there’s no way Fred’s going to drop out merely to endorse McCain’s support of amnesty, man-made global warming, and opposition to the Bush tax cuts. South Carolina Republicans are not going to support McCain merely because he’s a distinguished war veteran. And Mike Huckabee’s class warfare simply will not play here. Fred’s the real conservative, and he’s in this for the long haul.
Posted by: Vince | Jan 5, 2008 4:30:31 PM
WELL WELL , another kool-aid drinking liberal strikes again ! I had been wondering when mccain will drop out for 4 months now , his campaigne is almost bankrupt , he finished 4th in Iowa , and South Carolinians proved they dont want him in 2000 .......Whats left , drop out with dignity after you lose on tuesday and through your support to the only REAL conservitive in the race , Fred D. Thompson . It’s clear to me Obama will pull enough of the young independent voters of New Hampshire from Mcain to keep him a lower tier candidate . not to mention all the votes ron paul will get from independnts ...... sorry sen. , wont happen for you twice in New Hamshire !
Posted by: kevin | Jan 5, 2008 4:34:16 PM
TIME FOR MCCAIN TO GET OUT AND ENDORSE FRED. MCCAIN BLEW IT EARLY ON. MCCAIN WAS THE ANNOINTED ONE AT THE START. HE HAD A LOUSY TEAM WHO ROLLED HIM ON ALL THE MONEY HE RAISED. THE WORST PART OF MCCAIN IS THE FACT THAT HE IS PRO-AMNESTY. MCCAIN CUT HIS OWN THROAT.
Posted by: thestateisaschill | Jan 5, 2008 4:46:16 PM
Either McCain OR Bush was choosing the lesser of two evils and Bush was unquestionably the better of the two.
In going back over McCain’s record combined with his several recent mindnumbing failures in pursuing socialism, not cutting taxes, infringing our inalienable rights, promoting bigger government and pursuing even more damage to our sovereignty, this argument isn’t even debatable.
While he constantly offers he’s a hero for his service in surviving capture of the enemy, I can now point to many military hero’s who adamantly claim he is not and in his only other apparent stake to the highest office of our land inwhich he is for the war against terrorism ( which only the reasonable are )...this does not a president make, far from it.
Where his anger won’t get us into trouble it will certainly hold us back and cause great turmoil from within and a dictator I’m not ready for...McCain isn’t even material for a senator.
Fred Thompson merely needs to hang in there long enough for the people to know the records of the other’s which will swiftly end their candidacies and rightly so.
Posted by: Winghunter | Jan 5, 2008 5:41:14 PM
I cannot believe what I just read. Fred Thompson is the ONLY Republican candidate that continues the Reagan Revolution. McCain is the one who should drop out and help restore a real conservative to the White House. I sure hope voters in the South are smarter than those in Iowa who brought into Huckabee’s schtick. I truly gave Huckabee a chance to earn my support, but when light was shed on his record, I knew I wasn’t leaving Thompson’s side. McCain never had a chance with me or with it appears a majority of Republicans. Romney might as well be Bill Clinton as slick as he is. No thanks, give me Fred in 08!!!!!
Posted by: Dale | Jan 5, 2008 5:51:50 PM
Check it out folks, the news from an hour ago is that Robert Novak discovered that Mitt Romney’s campaign was behind the Politico hit piece that said Thompson was going to drop out and support McCain..
The purpose was to cause strife between these two campaigns so no one could challendge Romney for 2nd place in Iowa.
Romney’s campaign obviously feared that Thompson was gaining too much traction.
Posted by: Carlos | Jan 5, 2008 6:11:10 PM
Novak is another pundit that demonstrates he also doesn’t have a clue on several issues although rumor has it that McCain’s campaign was indicated also in this continued subversion of our election process.
Yet, Fred has weathered many such attacks even though they have taken their toll;
AP Gives Thompson the ‘04 Treatment
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24127
Posted by: Winghunter | Jan 5, 2008 6:25:08 PM
Well, THAT was a lively discussion for a Friday. If I didn’t know better, I’d think I was deliberately provoking folks just to get things stirred up on a slow blog day.
But I wasn’t. If I’d wanted to do THAT, I would have put “Ron Paul” in the headline. That always does the trick.
As for the folks who have kindly suggested I’m not aware of what Sen. Thompson brings to the table, and have directed me to his Web site (which my main blog page links to, day in and day out), rest assured that I have BEEN out there and listened to Fred (just click on the link; there’s video, shot by yours truly — and here’s more), and it is on the basis of that that I have written about his failure to explain why he’s in the race (or not in the race, depending upon your perspective).
Anyway, look at the poll numbers and other factors in New Hampshire, read up on the situation there, and you might see where I’m coming from. Or not. Either way, thanks for joining in the discussion.
Posted by: Brad Warthen | Jan 5, 2008 8:37:57 PM
Brad-
With all due respect, Fred Thompson has talked at length on numerous occasions why he’s in the race. Perhaps you need to need to actually undertake some due diligence and research the record, his answer is out there. And irregardless of the polls in NH, he is the only adult in the room who consistently stands on principle and tells the truth. That’s not something to dismiss so casually as you do, and there are many voters across the country to whom that actually matters.
JJ here. I apologize to the whole comments post. But, I thought it was relevant. I should have posted all comments in my original post.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled One Adult (Fred Thompson), Bobbisox wrote:
EXCELLENT! I am glad to see other opinions of how they feel how FRED performed. I was quite shocked to hear George Ste.... state that FRED did quite well!
Best debate format so far. I was impressed. We’ll see how “Fair and Balanced” FoxNews can be tomorrow night.
FRED THOMPSON - NATIONAL SECURITY EXPERIENCE (I’ll protect the American people and American values, whatever it takes to stop the Islamic-Fascists including water-boarding!) -
2ND AMENDMENT ADVOCATE (“Individual” rights to protect their homes and property!)
INCREASE THE MILITARY’S STRENGTH AND SIZE (Diplomacy through Strength and verification!)
SECURE AND SEAL THE BORDERS (Don’t give sanctuary anywhere to illegal’s; don’t employ illegal’s; don’t rent to illegal’s; don’t extend credit to illegal’s; don’t give illegal’s rights they have no right to; report all crimes committed by illegal’s to ICE and immediately deport those illegal’s who have already committed crimes against America!) LAW AND ORDER (Enforcement of our current laws regarding illegal immigration!) –
DENY FEDERAL DOLLARS TO SANCTUARY CITIES (Enough is enough!)
CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES FOR SUPREMES (Great progress has been made on the Supreme Court in Bush’s term. FRED was asked by President Bush to spirit Justice Roberts through the confirmation process. The next President will probably have the opportunity to seat two additional Justices. This is huge folks. FRED will nominate Justices who will interpret the Constitution, not create rights that simply do not exist and legislate from the bench!) –
PRO-LIFE ADVOCATE (will strive to nominate superior Justices with the eventual goal of overturning Roe vs Wade)
SOCIAL SECURITY REFORMER (Social Security is an entitlement program that will soon overtake the budget. The program can’t sustain itself and will bankrupt future generations; FRED has detailed proposals to save Social Security and provide the added benefit of private savings accounts for younger workers!)
DEFEAT ANY DEMOCRAT OR RINO (Close your eyes and imagine the first debate between FRED THOMPSON and ANY liberal DemocRAT they put up?)
TAX SIMPLIFICATION (Reform and perhaps eliminate the IRS with a variety of choice for the tax payer!)
EDUCATION (Return education to the States. It is that simple. The NEA is the greatest enemy of our educational system!)
WON’T PUT UP WITH TRUTH MANIPULATION FROM THE DB-MSM (including stupid questions by liberal moderators, and “purchased” political pundits)
FRED THOMPSON IS THE “WE THE PEOPLE” CANDIDATE (We the People asked him to set aside his personal life and step up one more time for his Country…and he stepped up!)
I am nystified as to why folks still think that NH has any relevance to the outcome of the Republican nomination. Considering that two of the most recent winners of the primary were John Mc Cain and Pat Buchanan, neither of which ever made it near the nomination, it seems like it really doesn't matter who wins it, except maybe for bragging rights.
If Fred does well, that WILL be great, because he hasn't campaigned a whole lot there, and he knows that, recently anyway, they don't seem to like Southern candidates. His performance in the debate last night might nudge some his way, in spite of his not being supported by the NH GOP leaders. I'd love to see him come in 3rd or so in NH, but I doubt that will happen, not because he doesn't deserve it, but because NH voters can be strange.