So one candidate’s numbers are in the low teens and the other is in, well less than 1%. And using your logic the 1%er is the better campaigner. You and pissant are cut from the same cloth.Fred has a slim chance at winning, Duncan has none. Simple truth!
***Whoever wins the GOP nomination is going to have the MSM media turn on him. What we need is the most solid, rock-ribbed conservative in the race. The media will work themselves into a frenzy trying to make him look bad, and it will backfire because most of america is conservative. When the media gets worked up and jumps the shark, it does not even know that it has done so, like when Dan Rather did his thing. But if the GOP candidate is a centrist, it plays right into the media’s hands and they don’t work themselves into such a frenzy. That’s how Bill Sali won Idaho, Prop 187 was passed in liberal California, and even how Reagan won. Hunter is the only candidate who can survive the oncoming media heat; Fred has said that he doesn’t even like the process of running for president. Hunter is the better man and the better candidate.
Being a better man is up to the ones personal choices, I wouldn't think of bad mouthing Duncan Hunter I deal strictly with realities and no matter how much you believe in Duncan he has gone nowhere. Fred has done little more at this stage but in the only voting that has taken place he was #3. Fred and Duncan are my two favorites. Unlike some people I see no advantage in dragging down another conservative.