[Shryke]

I know where you guys are coming from on this, but you must realize that this article is clearly leaving out very critical details. Look, the ACLU won’t take the case. The ACLU!

[mkjessup]

I know where you guys are coming from on this, but you must realize that this article is clearly leaving out very critical details. Look, the ACLU won’t take the case. The ACLU!

How many cases of homeowners defending their lives and property with a FIREARM has the ACLU taken up?

Even if they stepped in on the singular issue of the crooked cops and feds stealing money from the victim, it would be seen as defending gun owners who blast away home invaders, and the ACLU wouldn't be caught dead doing that.

[Squeako]

Look, the ACLU won’t take the case. The ACLU!

I have to admit, you got me there. Nicely played hand, FRiend!

[steve-b]

Well, duh. The ACLU with its nine-amendment Bill of Rights isn't going to defend a homeowner who used an Evil Firearm[tm] to defend himself.

For that matter, the attitude of the local cops is easily understood if they're one of those departments that hates the idea of armed private citizens.

[Ken H]

I know where you guys are coming from on this, but you must realize that this article is clearly leaving out very critical details. Look, the ACLU won't take the case. The ACLU!

Where are you getting that?

[microgood]

Look, the ACLU won’t take the case. The ACLU!

Its because they realize it is hopeless. This guy has to prove he is innocent. And that is impossible to do, which is why those evil scum can take the money with impunity.