Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bruinbirdman

I am really forced to think that these scientists are lying or totally misrepresenting or misunderstanding their findings. I have not noticed any examples of plants blooming two-six months out of sequence, nor do I see how an average change in temperature of less than one degree in the last century can have caused the changes they are claiming. If the average spring temp in England rises from - say - 43 degrees to 44 degrees, how will that cause the changes they are claiming to see? Sometimes a very mild winter/spring will cause plants to bloom 3-4 weeks early, but not 3-6 months. Cold is far more dangerous to the survival of plants than warmth.


13 posted on 12/19/2007 5:58:21 PM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle
"I have not noticed any examples of plants blooming two-six months out of sequence,"

I have definitely noticed that the days are getting shorter.

yitbos

15 posted on 12/19/2007 6:19:03 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson