Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Young, Poor Prefer Cells to Landlines
AP ^ | 12-10-2007 | ALAN FRAM

Posted on 12/11/2007 6:38:30 AM PST by Cagey

WASHINGTON (AP) - More than one in eight households have cell phones but lack traditional landline telephones, according to a federal study released Monday that tracks the country's growing dependence on wireless phones.

The data, reported twice a year, suggested that the number of households relying solely on cell phones may be growing more slowly than it had in the past. But the researchers said the slowdown might be due to changes in their survey, including altering the order of some questions and some of the wording.

"We don't know how much reflects reality and how much reflects changes in the questionnaire," said Stephen Blumberg, senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and an author of the report.

The report released Monday showed that for the first half of 2007, 14 percent of households had cell phone service but no landline telephones. That was less than 1 percentage point over the second half of 2006 - not a statistically significant difference.

For the second part of 2006, the increase in those households had been about 2 percent over the previous six-month period.

The growth of families reachable only by cell phone has been of special interest to the telephone industry, providers of 911 emergency services, and public and private polling organizations.

Pollsters typically rely on random calls to households with landline telephones, but some have begun reaching out to cell-phone users, which is more expensive and makes it harder to ensure their samples are truly random.

The federal data showed once again that young, poor, male and Hispanic people are likelier to have only wireless telephone service.

Nearly one in five Hispanic adults - 18 percent - have cell phones but no landline phones, the survey showed. That was up from 15 percent in the last half of 2006.

In addition for the first half of 2007,

_11 percent of white adults and 14 percent of black adults had only cell phone service.

_Roughly three in 10 people age 18 to 29 had only wireless telephones - more than double the portion of those age 30 and older who rely only on cell phones.

_14 percent of males and 12 percent of females only had cell phone service.

_About one in five poor people have only cell phones, about double the percentage for those who are not poor.

_59 percent of households have landlines and cell phones, and 24 percent have only landlines.

The National Health Interview Survey, conducted by the CDC, involved in-person interviews with people in 15,996 households conducted from January through June of this year.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: CholeraJoe

I remember those:) With the exception of the past year, I ‘ve had maybe 3 telemarketing calls in the previous 8 years. In the past year I got about 4 unique sales calls (and many repeats) but those have stopped.


21 posted on 12/11/2007 7:05:07 AM PST by posterchild ("Congress does two things very well: one is nothing and two is overreact." - Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

having a cell phone can be much cheaper than owning a landline. if i was poor, i would probably opt with the cell phone only over having a landline too.


22 posted on 12/11/2007 7:06:33 AM PST by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Prepaid phones are often very inexpensive, and you can’t run up a big bill because once the minutes run out, the phone doesn’t work until you buy more. Very up-front. There’s also no long-term commitment to a monthly bill, which is a big plus for those who aren’t financially stable.

A cell with a major provider with a longterm contract would be a different thing, of course.


23 posted on 12/11/2007 7:07:12 AM PST by RosieCotton ("Anything worth doing is worth doing badly." -- G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
11 percent of white adults had only cell phone service.

I'm among this percentage. Haven't had a landline in three years. Haven't missed it once.

24 posted on 12/11/2007 7:08:33 AM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

My cheapo cell phone costs $80 a year, has never given me a problem over 3 years of use, and I’ve dropped it plenty of times so it came apart in 4 pieces, but it always worked. The service is never interrupted, there are no contracts or commitments.
All they ask is that I buy a $20 phone card every 3 months, that’s the $80. The phone itself cost around $30.
I think poor people could deal with that!
My land line costs $25 a month, more or less. Doesn’t have all the features of the cell phone, no caller id, no portability, no voice mail, no text messaging, no alarm clock, etc.


25 posted on 12/11/2007 7:09:17 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( "Do well, but remember to do good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

OK WTF is the CDC conducting studies on Cell Phone usage?

Exactly what horrific cell phone based disease have my tax dollars gone toward preventing?


26 posted on 12/11/2007 7:09:17 AM PST by PissAndVinegar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PissAndVinegar

That’s exactly why I mentioned my headache. Another waste of time and money.


27 posted on 12/11/2007 7:11:12 AM PST by Cagey (Many go fishing all their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after.......Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Did your phone company require that you get voice service in order to have DSL?


28 posted on 12/11/2007 7:12:56 AM PST by posterchild ("Congress does two things very well: one is nothing and two is overreact." - Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

I will never be without a real phone.

Until they improve quality of sound and consistency, and make a FULL SIZE phone instead of these teeny tiny things I can hardly hold with my hand, and don’t reach my mouth anyway, I will continue having 1. It’s reliable and doesn’t ever go in & out and sound like a teleconference. Even the remote phones inside the house are better than cellulars. (Actually, my ancient 1 is best - many of the modern 1s are almost as poor as cell phones.)

And I’m “young”.


29 posted on 12/11/2007 7:14:46 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

I find the landline convenient, but then I’m home most of time. When I’m not home, usually others are, and I have my cell phone so they can call me!


30 posted on 12/11/2007 7:16:15 AM PST by Tax-chick (Every committee wants to take over the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kalee

Well, I guess I still fit their notion of young, but the hubby doesn’t...we aren’t poor, I’m not male, and neither of us are Hispanic, and we have excellent credit...BUT we haven’t had a landline in over a year. Hubby had to have a cell phone for work, and it turned out that the long distance was cheaper than on the landline. The real zinger was the do not call list...we got spam calls ALL THE TIME! So, we added our number to the list...and got spam charity calls ALL THE TIME! I prefer to give on my own...being asked really turns me off. The only spam we’ve gotten on our cell phones is some Mexican guy who calls hubby about once a day and babbles in Spanish...at first hubby was nice and told the guy he had the wrong number...but the dude doesn’t seem to understand English.


31 posted on 12/11/2007 7:17:21 AM PST by Cailleach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

LOL that’s ignorant.
For a landline you may be required to pay a deposit, not to speak of a definite monthly bill. A pay as you go cellphone is cheap and you buy minutes when you can afford it.
Some of this survey is a no-brainer; transient people or those without steady income are going to take the more flexible and cheaper route.
As for your DVD player comment, you can get them relatively cheaply nowadays, and owning a DVD player and renting movies is alot cheaper than paying for cable or satellite TV or going to a theater.
I hope you always have plenty of money because you don’t know much about getting by with less.


32 posted on 12/11/2007 7:21:35 AM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: posterchild

We have to keep our landline for the DSL.
It’s a bit like the cable company charging more for internet service to people who don’t buy their cable TV package.
Bunch of scam artists ...


33 posted on 12/11/2007 7:24:14 AM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
it’s the landline phone accounts that allow the city (police, fire, ect) to see just who lives in a given structure

Cell phones are extreme personal tracking devices. When a crime occurs it's possible for the police to get a list of most everyone that was within the cell at the time. It's amazing that not only the government has everyone wearing a personal tracking device, but that people also pay $50/month for the privilege!

34 posted on 12/11/2007 7:24:38 AM PST by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Poor people have more fluid living arrangements, often moving from apartment to apartment. Landlines don’t make good sense.


35 posted on 12/11/2007 7:25:30 AM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Sounds like you need a cell-modem then so you can ditch dialup.


36 posted on 12/11/2007 7:27:20 AM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
"We don't know how much reflects reality and how much reflects changes in the questionnaire," said Stephen Blumberg, senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and an author of the report.

And he's a SENIOR scientist. Just think if he were a junior scientist.

37 posted on 12/11/2007 7:29:46 AM PST by subterfuge (HILLARY IS: She who must NOT be Dismayed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
Cell phones are extreme personal tracking devices. When a crime occurs it's possible for the police to get a list of most everyone that was within the cell at the time.

Where do you live that this would be possible? Sure, the police might be able to get a list of who was within the range of a tower here, but that would only be two or three hundred thousand people.

38 posted on 12/11/2007 7:29:52 AM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
“Cell phones are extreme personal tracking devices.”

yep, if my phone is on they can find the phone.

But if you pay for a landline they know where you live, and that’s a little different. They (the government) is losing the ability to determine where I live.

Voting, taxes, eligibility for lots of things is determined by where you live.

39 posted on 12/11/2007 7:30:02 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cailleach

Sounds like your husband could use the language lesson in this thread. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926720/posts


40 posted on 12/11/2007 7:30:58 AM PST by posterchild ("Congress does two things very well: one is nothing and two is overreact." - Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson