Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mware
Peg the fact they are not saying it, may speak volumes.

Like they figured that declaring 'not terrorism' before all the debris has fallen isn't credible to us sheep?

229 posted on 12/09/2007 2:07:02 PM PST by null and void (No more Bushes/No more Clintons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

Amazing they were actually debating wheather this was a hate crime or not.


238 posted on 12/09/2007 2:09:00 PM PST by mware (Americans in arm chairs doing the work of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
So the logisc is: "If they say it's not terrorism -- we're mad that hey won't tell us it's terrorism"

And if they DON'T say "it's not terrorism" then, AHA, we know it's terrorism??

Let's give it a few minutes for facts to emerge??

The shooter at the Jewish center in Seattle -- definist sudden jihadist. Afghans who run people down in SF and NC -- definite suddent jihadist.

Salt lake City shooter -- definite muslim, possible suddent jihadist.

Omaha guy -- despite NZ who says he looks pakistani, his picture and background is perfect white stoner loser, at least pending any real information, of which I have seen none. If he's Middle Eastern, so are 90% of the folks in my vicinty!

And American losers have been killing folks (usually ex-girlfriends, etc, but sometimes random) for a long time now.

278 posted on 12/09/2007 2:18:11 PM PST by BohDaThone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson