Posted on 12/06/2007 7:30:54 AM PST by reaganaut1
It appears they were snookered. Oh, well. Learn something, y’all.
There is so much more to this story.
I wonder what percentage of these “subprime loans” (isn’t that a far nicer-sounding term than “high-risk loans”) went to illegal immigrants?
Yeah, right. These people will drive 50 miles to save a buck on a bag of rice, but they thought they could buy the half a mil house.
I heard that the bailout is going to be very selective. You have to have a perfect mortgage payment record and proof that you cannot pay the higher rates. Proof of employment and income is going to be necessary. It’s a government thing so you know that the paperwork is going to be endless. If they start having to justify extensions, etc., they aren’t going to be able to show the right documentation (in spite of their earlier success in duping lenders). They are going to have to show government workers their social security cards, etc.
The bailout should specifically not apply to illegals. Having them lose everything they own would be a good way to get them to go home.
A large number of these ‘homeowners’ were actually part of fraud rings. With no doc morgages being passed out like candy, house flipping was easy money. All you need is a mortgage broker, a clueless menial wage worker, and a sham owner. The sham owner buys the house and with the mortgage broker and cooked appraiser working together, they find the new dummy to offer way more than the sham onwer bought the house or condo for. Of course prices were going up $100k a year, but only as long as the Ponzi scheme could convince dummies to take out mortgages they could not afford, and as long as banks would lend money at low rates with no credit standards. When rates went up and the market slowed, the backlash was sudden and swift. The only difference between the crooks on Wall St who packaged the CDO’s and the ‘minister’ who arranged the mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them is the Wall St types made the most moeny and the ‘minister’ probably is not setting up mortgages anymore. Both are crooks in my book.
Maybe I’m a really bad person for saying it, but here it goes:
This reminds me of the Albanian pyramid scheme. People wondered how so many people could be fooled but in fact no one was fooled. They were all in on the scam, figuring they’d profit under the “greater fool” theory.
The information that they already had a poor credit history suggests that they missed the connection between borrowing money and paying it back.
Just philosophizing here ... I wonder if this attitude has anything to do with the outrageous inflation and other economic stupidity typical of South American countries. I also wonder whether their church is the "prosperity gospel" sort, leading them to believe that church members were immune to financial losses.
Geeze...although I've never applied for one I'm not at all certain that I could qualify for a $700K mortgage.And I'm no housekeeper,either.
Probably learning English would be a good start to understanding what is beneficial and what is a rip off.
Oh, haven’t you heard ? It’s entirely voluntary by the lender - as long as you pretend not to see the government gun pointed at your back.
“Weak credit and low wages weren’t barriers”....Oh really?...apparently brains weren’t barriers either!
Are these some of the people that Bush and Paulson want to bail out (admittedly under Democratic pressure)?Don't let them fool you, bailouts are for the lenders, not the borrowers.
My wife and I make real good money, even if we did qualify for a $700K mortgage there is no way we could make those payments!
Ms. Costa, the housekeeper, secured a $713,000 sub-prime mortgage.
$713,000?!?
This isn't just criminal - its criminally STOO-PID™ on the Housekeeper's part.
This is what happens when we're invaded by people with a 3rd grade, 3rd World education and think money grows on trees in the USA.
And I don't give a rat's ___ if she was scammed on the $100K/yr appreciation bs. Borrowing $713K, unfreaking believable, how do you even make the 1st payment????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.