To: neverdem
Who cares about his personal life? I don’t. If he had broken the law, he should have been charged
2 posted on
11/30/2007 5:07:41 PM PST by
Perdogg
(Elections have consequences.)
To: Perdogg
Who cares about his personal life?Hardly anyone will care once his candidacy is snuffed out. But, a lot of us feel you have to choose between being president and being a pervert. That only seems like a lofty standard to the elitist wing of the party.
5 posted on
11/30/2007 5:11:51 PM PST by
tear gas
(Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
To: Perdogg
Who cares about his personal life? I don’t. If he had broken the law, he should have been charged Yeah it's just sex, can't we move on and overlook Rudy's disgusting morals? 9/11 NEVER FORGET! Let's also apologize to Bill Clinton for criticizing him as well.
To: Perdogg
The voter cares and is fed up with this nonsense. One of the big reasons why Clinton’s negatives are so high is because of 8 years of this kind of sleaziness. The Republicans lost congress because of these kinds of problems.
14 posted on
11/30/2007 5:40:25 PM PST by
Fred
(The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nilhilism)
To: Perdogg
"Who cares about his personal life? I don’t. If he had broken the law, he should have been charged"
This isn't about his personal life.
The city should not be paying protection for his girl-friend while he is married, period!.
At best this just shows the complete lack of ethics by Rudy,at worst, it is a case of embezzlement as he was charging the city for protection services for his girl-friend that should never have occured.
Disclaimer, I am not familiar with NYC law on this matter.
To: Perdogg
Who cares about his personal life? If he uses taxpayer dollars to fund his folly, I care.
37 posted on
11/30/2007 6:33:28 PM PST by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: Perdogg
Who cares about his personal life? I don’t. If he had broken the law, he should have been charged Now I know the definition of one being in the tank. :)
51 posted on
11/30/2007 7:09:38 PM PST by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: Perdogg
Who cares about his personal life? I don’t. If he had broken the law, he should have been charged. When taxpayer dollars and non-transparent government accounting practices are involved, I emphatically do not consider it merely Giuliani's personal life.
I respectfully submit that your post is a good example of why I believe a Giuliani presidency would be worse in some ways than even a 'toon presidency. Almost all pubbies would condemn this type of behavior from a president 'toon. About a a third of pubbies apparently will excuse this type of behavior from a president Giuliani.
It's just support for my contention that many pubbies will make excuses for Giuliani if/when he nominates a liberal judge, or supports gun-grabbing legislation. If it's president 'toon doing such things, I expect republicans will band together against it.
56 posted on
11/30/2007 7:32:29 PM PST by
ellery
(I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
To: Perdogg
It is getting harder and harder just to find one decent man.
61 posted on
11/30/2007 10:00:29 PM PST by
tessalu
To: Perdogg
Who cares about his personal life? I don’t. If he had broken the law, he should have been charged Should people care? Arguable. Will people care next November? Probably.
Hitlery's minions would run attack ads reminding swing state Reagan Democrats of Rudy's disgusting personal life. This is yet another of Rudy's vulnerabilities. It is further evidence that he is not electable next November. As such, he cannot be allowed to win the nomination.
62 posted on
11/30/2007 10:11:52 PM PST by
stillonaroll
(Rudy = Hillary: pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson