The tape was one of 90 Paul was ordered to turn over to the attorney's office in 2001 as part of the investigation in a related securities case against him. But the tape was not released until after all investigations were concluded into Sen. Clinton's role with Paul. It has never been used as evidence, despite its relevance to the key question of Sen. Clinton's involvement in the Hollywood fundraiser. A federal judge and the prosecutor in the 2005 trial of Sen. Clinton's finance director, David Rosen, insisted the senator was not involved in any direct way in the matter.
To: doug from upland
It sounds like the teflon is working still.
To: doug from upland
I hope Peter Paul kept copies of all these tapes?!
To: doug from upland
Lay with wolves, get eaten by wolves.
8 posted on
11/26/2007 8:42:53 AM PST by
Bruinator
To: doug from upland
there seems to be some risk with this filing.
If The Supremes of California rule the conduct is not criminal, does that potentially kill the “smoking gun” tape from being used in his suit v. Bill Clinton ?
You can’t unring the bell...and the Clintons will move for immediate dismissal. Could this be in the appeals process a long time before it ever sees the court room ?
To: DAVEY CROCKETT; Calpernia; Founding Father; milford421; LibertyRocks
18 posted on
11/26/2007 12:19:17 PM PST by
nw_arizona_granny
(This is "Be an Angel Day", do something nice for someone today.)
To: doug from upland
19 posted on
11/26/2007 2:45:56 PM PST by
Gritty
(I sure don't want Democrats or their supporters engaging in politics of personal destruction-Hillary)
To: doug from upland
.."she'll avoid the trail so she won't cross the picket line"
21 posted on
11/26/2007 3:11:34 PM PST by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson