Skip to comments.
How sex ed harms girls' health
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| November 16, 2007
| Ashley Herzog
Posted on 11/19/2007 11:10:26 AM PST by HerzogAEH
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
1
posted on
11/19/2007 11:10:27 AM PST
by
HerzogAEH
To: HerzogAEH
2
posted on
11/19/2007 11:12:49 AM PST
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Tracking The "Flyin' Imams Since 11/20/06)
To: HerzogAEH
Most girls who get pregnant already know about birth control. They just refuse to use it. If the guy refuses to use a condom, what’s the girl going to say? No? If she could do that, they wouldn’t be talking about a condom.
3
posted on
11/19/2007 11:12:59 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: HerzogAEH
Good job! And welcome to FR!!
4
posted on
11/19/2007 11:13:10 AM PST
by
JRios1968
(Faith is not believing that God can. It is knowing that God will. - Ben Stein)
To: HerzogAEH
They don't particularly care about teens especially girls, who are more likely to suffer physical and emotional consequences from early sexual activity. They care about undermining traditional values and promoting libertine attitudes about sex.
Bravo.
5
posted on
11/19/2007 11:15:14 AM PST
by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
To: HerzogAEH
Bingo. Another leg of the manifesto.
You know the destruction of marriage and family has always been a plank regarding genocide.
It’s usually implemented at the same time children are killed or the public’s told there’s overpopulation.
See Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler
6
posted on
11/19/2007 11:18:04 AM PST
by
AliVeritas
(Pray for the souls of the faithful departed.)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: HerzogAEH
8
posted on
11/19/2007 11:20:06 AM PST
by
Tribune7
(Dems want to rob from the poor to give to the rich)
To: HerzogAEH
Question: I saw the Flickr link in your FR profile. How does what you wrote jive with what you wear? It seems like they are contradictory.
9
posted on
11/19/2007 11:20:43 AM PST
by
Pyro7480
("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
To: HerzogAEH
P.C. is not only affecting girls health...it is affecting the health of the entire country!
10
posted on
11/19/2007 11:22:19 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: Pyro7480
Are you kidding? I went to see the pics. She’s gorgeous, and covered in all the right places.
After all, she’s not a nun.
11
posted on
11/19/2007 11:25:20 AM PST
by
Palladin
("How do we beat The Bitch?"--John McCain Supporter)
To: HerzogAEH
If I may repost something I posted on another thread?
#3 and the following paragraphs seem like the may be relevant here...
Indeed! I think there are three main reasons arranged marriages have a high success rate:
1) The couple goes into the marriage without unrealistically high expectations.
2) The families dont select based on lust.
3) In the societies that practice arranged marriage it is very likely that the first sexual partner is the new spouse.
By the time they have worked their way through the Kama Sutra (for example) they are pretty thoroughly imprinted on each other.
Contrast that to the dozens or even scores of partners the typical bride and groom may have here, the sense of bonding is so blurred and degraded that it cant act as a glue to hold them together.
414 posted on 11/14/2007 2:09:49 PM PST by null and void
12
posted on
11/19/2007 11:25:25 AM PST
by
null and void
(No more Bushes/No more Clintons)
To: Pyro7480; HerzogAEH
Oh my. Definitely Welcome to FR!
13
posted on
11/19/2007 11:27:59 AM PST
by
null and void
(No more Bushes/No more Clintons)
To: HerzogAEH
I feel so sorry for girls now days because they skip the romance.
14
posted on
11/19/2007 11:28:38 AM PST
by
donna
(The United States Constitution and the Koran are mutually exclusive.)
To: Palladin
Modesty is more than being “covered in all the right places.” And it’s not about being dress in a nun’s habit or a Islamic veil. Find the happy medium.
15
posted on
11/19/2007 11:28:59 AM PST
by
Pyro7480
("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
To: null and void
Contrast that to the dozens or even scores of partners the typical bride and groom may have here, the sense of bonding is so blurred and degraded that it cant act as a glue to hold them together. One writer I saw put it like this: "A woman who is communal property is beyond individual interest."
16
posted on
11/19/2007 11:30:54 AM PST
by
thulldud
To: HerzogAEH
In the upside-down world of politically correct health care, the main priority is to never make moral judgments about a patients behavior, and factual information is suppressed if it threatens political agendas. This is the goal of the Sex Positive agenda. End ALL moral judgements over sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).
Sex Positive proponents oppose abstinence not because "it doesn't work" but because they see sexual pleasure as a birthright and seek to see everyone sexually active at every age. They see abstinence as "unhealthy" because it is a supression of sexual desires.
I think that it is positive.org that has a campaign called "just say YES" because there are too many stuffy adults already telling kids what they can and cannot do.
The Sex Positive agenda has been defined by Kinsey, Reich, and feminists.
17
posted on
11/19/2007 11:38:59 AM PST
by
weegee
(End the Bush-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton-Clinton/Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton Oligarchy 1980-2012)
To: Jaysun
Planned Parenthood made the rounds again last week “debating” the concept of teaching abstinence to teens.
Planned Parenthood makes no money when kids say “No”. They sell birth control, counseling, and abortions.
18
posted on
11/19/2007 11:40:21 AM PST
by
weegee
(End the Bush-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton-Clinton/Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton Oligarchy 1980-2012)
To: Pyro7480
Question: I saw the Flickr link in your FR profile.
I did too! She is one sweety; Pryo, what is the contradiction?
To: HerzogAEH
20
posted on
11/19/2007 11:44:51 AM PST
by
krb
(If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson