To: FocusNexus
The NYT printed this?
Is there bad blood between them and CNN?
3 posted on
11/17/2007 12:53:42 PM PST by
RJL
To: RJL
It is in an NYT BLOG, probably NO ink involved.
8 posted on
11/17/2007 1:03:20 PM PST by
weegee
(End the Bush-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton-Clinton/Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton Oligarchy 1980-2012)
To: RJL
“The NYT printed this?”
I am totally surprised too!
To: RJL
I think this is all a ploy to make this kind of stuff “old news” and unworthy of comment when it happens next year.
Notice no one is talking about the money/fund raising scandles? It’s such old news that the Clintons are taking shady money that no one cares anymore.
27 posted on
11/17/2007 1:19:15 PM PST by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: RJL
The NYT printed this?
That's what I thought. It's more of a surprise this story saw the light of day at the NYTimes than it is to find out the debate was skewed Clinton.
42 posted on
11/17/2007 1:52:41 PM PST by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: RJL
Apparently.
Perhaps CNN is backing Clinton and the NYT thinks its a fatal mistake for the party ?
65 posted on
11/17/2007 4:46:48 PM PST by
festus
(Fred Thompson '08)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson