Why not take the man at his word? He said he was a Deist. Why would you doubt his own statement about his own beliefs?
Non-responsive, Sir. You can misrepresent my objections all you want, it doesnt change the fact that you are either unwilling or unable to define what Old Ben meant by Deist, and you seem equally unwilling to come to grips with the fact that without defining the meaning of Deist you then become free to change the meaning of the term at your discretion, as often as a mother changes diapers, while misrepresenting every switch as infallibly the very last word on the wisdom of Dr. Franklin himself. All done in the finest Liberal tradition of ignoring the crucial question and shifting the burden to a more comfortable subject.