How odd. According to this site, Paul is irrelevant yet dangerous. I wonder how that can be....
Tampering with the election process at a tiome when elections are desided by only a couple points...
Tampering with the party nomination process... is always dangerous.
http://www.primarilypaul.com/ron-paul-in-the-primaries/
If Paul IS relevant then he IS dangerous. Thankfully he isn't relevant as far as actual Republicans are concerned so he will not be the Republican nominee.
A vast majority of Republicans support the existence of the Department of Homeland Security and still fight the good fight to make sure national security is enhanced as reasonably necessary while still retaining valid privacy safeguards.
What is not going to happen is a complete dismantaling of the D of HS. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE DONE BY EITHER PARTY so it is an absolute waste of time to turn to a candidate that may have a couple valid critiques but then wants to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
This is why Paul could NEVER be considered seriously as the Commander-In-Chief. His idea of the military is that it is a standard military-industrial-complex-scam in peacetime and a super-sized military-industrial-complex-scam during war. His lack of support for D of HS matches his lack of support for the military because he will not acknowledge the basic structure, hiearchy, etc. necessary for either department. He doesn't need to - just highlight some imperfection and then say, "Scrap the whole kit-and-kaboodle!"
That is the sure sign of an appeaser and a simple thinker playing only to emotions (so much like the left) and I thank God 99% of Republicans agree.