Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dusttoyou

Whoa, wait a minute. He voted for a FEDERAL Bill banning anyone transporting an under-aged girl across a state line to have an abortion..and you consider that a Federalist position? The Federalist position is letting STATES make laws banning such transport. Or do you consider it “Interstate Commerce?”


202 posted on 11/04/2007 3:59:20 PM PST by jonathanmo (So many phobes, so little time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: jonathanmo

it sure is interstate commerce. Abortion isn’t free.


204 posted on 11/04/2007 4:01:09 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: jonathanmo
He voted for a FEDERAL Bill banning anyone transporting an under-aged girl across a state line to have an abortion..and you consider that a Federalist position? ... Or do you consider it “Interstate Commerce?”

Did you miss the part where YOU typed "crossing state lines"?

The Federalist position is letting STATES make laws banning such transport.

States cannot forbid people from leaving the state to do something that is legal in another state. Otherwise, driving to Nevada for a quick romp at the Bunny Ranch would be impossible. It would also be illegal to go to another state to marry someone younger than you can in your own state (13 in some states, 17+ in others, if I recall correctly... and parental permission also factors into the age calculations).

225 posted on 11/04/2007 4:29:26 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson