Also same question with Mike Huckabee. I thought he impressed me the most, yet according to many on these threads he is just the new MSM darling they have decided to push to get Fred out of the race, and further split the social conservative vote.
Were you allowed free reign of thought, or were you asked more leading questions that benefited some (Rudy and Mike), at the exclusion of others (Fred). The only one that somewhat disappointed me was Mitt. I had liked him, and his chances before, but for some reason I just didn't "like" him last night. Did anyone else have that opinion?
that's my question too, looked like he was skewing it to favor rudy, from my perspective.
On Huckabee, I almost agree with you, but I’m working on the theory now that Fred was the one the MSM pushed to split up the social conservatives, and when they worked they decided to throw another one in to make it even more split.
Yes he was pushing the Rudy questions,then he had a total of one for Thompson, and then Romney rounded out a few. He mentioned Huckabee a few times just to add to the list of names. There were 4 who thought Huckabee won the debate...I was one of them. I thought he was strong and clear. But I am sure there will be someone here to tell me how wrong I am on that opinion ;)