Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eric in the Ozarks
1. It wasn't "Rumsfeld's rejection." It was the generals, who drew up the plan. If the original plan went as everyone thought, Saddam's guys would have fought early, and died early. We needed speed and mobility. More troops=slow, more supplies.

2. As I wrote in "America's Victories: Why the U.S. Wins Wars," the "surge" was working before it worked. That is, one of the MAIN reasons it's working---which everyone seems to ignore---is that we killed more than 40,000 of these guys, wounded 200,000, captured 25,000, and in all likelihood another 10,000 simply quit or defected. These are astounding numbers, and they mean that by the time the "surge" got in place, we had already hollowed out AQ in Iraq, very, very badly.

47 posted on 10/18/2007 9:29:23 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: LS

Going to check out your books. Do you have backup for those #’s you state- always looking to give lib friends cold hard facts to stymie their b.s. thanks


56 posted on 10/18/2007 10:04:34 AM PDT by petercooper ("Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime." - Nicole Gelinas - 02-10-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: LS

The generals said what Rummy wanted them to. Nothing more, nothing less. Who do you think they worked for ?


66 posted on 10/18/2007 11:16:03 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson