Some people's head's would explode if they actually had to form a consistent and coherent political philosophy that recognizes a level of intelligent debate regarding certain issues on which conservatives and libertarians can disagree. It's much easier for them to grasp this: pro war=conservative / anti-war=liberal
Yep and you are addressing yourself to one. His whole point on this thread has been “Ron Paul=Good. Anyone critical of Paul=evil”.
So perhaps YOU will care to try answering this? Or is sneering at everyone else the sum total of what you Paulbots can come up with?
(Spare me the hypocrisy of claiming you aren’t one. You rushed right in to defend the absurdity of what the Paulbots here have been saying on this thread. Your actions speak far louder then words)
Simple challenge to you Paulites. With NO slogans. NO demagoguery. NO sliming everyone else who doesn’t share your faith. Tell me HOW Paul would do anything. Here is his “Issues page”. NOT a word about what or how he would do anything. Just a bunch of slogans strung together basically screaming bile at everyone and everything.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/
See, you need us to support Dr Paul. We have no reason to support Dr Paul. So please explain to us WHAT and HOW a Paul Administration would do anything. Do that with OUT sliming any one. No name calling, no hysteric hyper emotive rhetoric. None of the usual Paulite personal attacks in place of reason argument. No cut and pasting of sound bite statements from Paul speeches. NO statements of what YOU think Paul means. REAL plans with documented links so we can read them for ourselves.