One aspect of Global Warming is the continual bias to news that supports it. As was famously said, by someone famous enough that I cannot call his name, that it only takes one contrary fact to destroy even the most elaborate theory.
In 1942, during WW II, a P-38 fighter airplane being ferried to England was forced to land on Greenland’s glacier. The pilot was rescued but the aircraft was abandoned.
In 1992 a team of explorers and aviation buffs set about recovering this aircraft. Over the last 50 years, it had become buried in 300 feet of ice and snow.
See:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/22/america/NA-GEN-US-Glacier-Plane.php
Now stop and consider that little fact: in the last 50 years, when advocates of Global Warming (a change of the climate that should, well, be observed globally, meaning everywhere) insist humanity has put the most CO2 in the atmosphere and should have experienced the most warming, that this area of Greenland enjoyed the accumuation of an additional 300 FEET of frozen precipiation.
Further consider that if the entire arctic is melting, as these sincere advocates of Global Warming insist, that such warming would be observed globally of course. Yet, we would have to see the melting of 300 FEET of ice to return to the level of the ice back in 1942.
If I am wrong here, please correct me.
It seems that the story of the recovery of this aircraft becomes one of the many contrary facts to the present theories (being assumed to be entirely true) about climate change.
I never thought about that! I seen a story on one of the documentary channels about the recovery of that aircraft. The implication as a weather indicator never occurred to me.