Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secrets of 1957 Sputnik launch revealed
Yahoo News / AP ^ | October 1, 2007 | VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV

Posted on 09/30/2007 8:40:32 PM PDT by Stoat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Photo

Jay Walker poses with his Sputnik satellite in his Ridgefield, Conn., home Friday, Sept. 28, 2007. The satellite, which Walker says is neither a model nor a replica, is one of the Sputnik satellites built by the Soviets in 1957. He says he acquired the satellite through a listing on eBay. (AP Photo/Bob Child)

Photo

Jay Walker poses with his Sputnik satellite in his Ridgefield, Conn., home Friday, Sept. 28, 2007. Walker says that he acquired the spacecraft, which he says is one of the original Sputniks built by the Soviets in 1957 and is neither a model nor a replica, through a listing placed on eBay by a pilot who frequently flew the Moscow route. Walker is the executive producer of the documentary film 'Sputnik Mania' that is being brought out in connection with the 50th anniversary of the launch of the original Sputnik on Oct. 4, 1957. Walker is the founder of Priceline.com. (AP Photo/Bob Child)

Photo

Graphic and illustration on Sputnik 1, the world's first satellite that was launched by Russia on October 4, 1957.(AFP Illustration)

Photo

Sputnik 1 -- the world's first artificial satellite -- was launched in 1957 from the Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan.(AFP/TASS)

1 posted on 09/30/2007 8:40:35 PM PDT by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Yuri Gagarin, the russian astronaut, was a hero


2 posted on 09/30/2007 8:42:39 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

bfl


3 posted on 09/30/2007 8:48:31 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Sounds like they “awakened a sleeping giant” into a development surge that they couldn’t match, especially from a cost perspective.


4 posted on 09/30/2007 8:52:00 PM PDT by LZ_Bayonet (There's Always Something.............And there's always something worse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

You’re absolutely right about Gagarin. And now, after hearing about it since I was a kid, I feel sad for the dog, who didn’t know what was going on as he was trapped up there.


5 posted on 09/30/2007 8:53:30 PM PDT by Moonmad27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
But 50 years later, it emerges that the momentous launch was far
from being part of a well-planned strategy to demonstrate communist superiority over the West.

Thats ok, look where it made America go. America always needs a challenge to go beyond imagination.

6 posted on 09/30/2007 8:53:56 PM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Great article, thanks for sharing.


7 posted on 09/30/2007 8:59:46 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I remember all of our family standing out in the yard watching that little spot of light move across the heavens.

So it was only a second stage booster it was still facinating!


8 posted on 09/30/2007 9:02:44 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (("democrat" 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses.'))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Two points stand out:

1) The Communists lied and exaggerated, aided by the mainstream press.

2) Notice the Kruschev's son is in a position at an Ivy League school?

Cheers!

9 posted on 09/30/2007 9:03:39 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax
Read a little further:

the world's first orbiter was born out of a very different Soviet program: the frantic development of a rocket capable of striking the United States with a hydrogen bomb.

10 posted on 09/30/2007 9:14:57 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'Chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LZ_Bayonet
Sounds like they “awakened a sleeping giant” into a development surge that they couldn’t match, especially from a cost perspective.

And thank goodness they did......from the article:

As described by the former scientists, the world's first orbiter was born out of a very different Soviet program: the frantic development of a rocket capable of striking the United States with a hydrogen bomb.

Because there was no telling how heavy the warhead would be, its R-7 ballistic missile was built with thrust to spare — "much more powerful than anything the Americans had," Georgy Grechko, a rocket engineer and cosmonaut, told AP.

The Leftist apologists and appeasers would have been delighted if we had grabbed our ankles after Sputnik and had believed their lies about how the Soviets were no threat and they wanted only to be our friends....the Commies were ready, willing and able to turn American cities into a radioactive wasteland.

Remember when Khrushchev said "We will bury you!" ?

He meant it.

11 posted on 09/30/2007 9:19:53 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Great article, thanks for sharing.

I'm delighted that you've enjoyed it, and you're quite welcome!  :-)

12 posted on 09/30/2007 9:21:39 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
I remember all of our family standing out in the yard watching that little spot of light move across the heavens.

It must have been both magical and awe-inspiring as well as terrifying, considering the demonic source of that little white spot of light.

So it was only a second stage booster it was still facinating!

Agreed....the booster was in a similar orbit as the Sputnik so it makes little difference.

13 posted on 09/30/2007 9:28:31 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

The oldest man made satellite in orbit, Vanguard 1, was designed by my father.
http://www.lindahall.org/events_exhib/sputnik/sputnik_roger.shtml


14 posted on 09/30/2007 9:35:26 PM PDT by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard from IL

How nice it is. 14 posts and none of the usual jerks have posted inane comments in their adolescent attempts at humor.


15 posted on 09/30/2007 9:45:44 PM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Both points are correct.

If their first attempt at human space flight had ended in death for the occupant of the vehicle, then we would not have heard of it until now.

Gagarin also did not land with his craft. The Russians did not have the technology (or the confidence!) in their vehicle to insure that the occupant in the craft would land safely. At a predetermined altitude, Gagarin was ejected from the craft and parachuted to earth. The Russians continued to use this type of “safe landing” system for a number of years until they employed a better way to slow down returning craft by a means of parachutes and rockets that fired just prior to touchdown.

16 posted on 09/30/2007 9:47:15 PM PDT by Mr. Jazzy (Very Proud Dad of LCpl Smoothguy242 USMC of 1/3 Marines, now fighting for freedom, on duty in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Richard from IL; All
The oldest man made satellite in orbit, Vanguard 1, was designed by my father.

WOW!  That's tremendous!

A graduate of Middlebury College with a degree in physics, Mr. Easton has been the recipient of numerous awards and honors for his technical achievements. Most notably, in 2006 President Bush awarded Mr. Easton the prestigious National Medal of Technology at a White House ceremony for his work with spacecraft tracking and GPS.

And congratulations as well!

I'm sure that you're aware of this site, but others here might not be.  I found it interesting because it continuously tracks how many orbits Vanguard 1 has made as well as how many miles it's traveled since launch.

VANGUARD 1 SATELLITE HISTORY

17 posted on 09/30/2007 9:47:52 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
What's amazing is that the R-7 launcher rocket that was designed in the 1950's is still operational today in an updated form as a satellite launcher! The Russians still use it to launch the current generation Soyuz TMA spacecraft that regularly visits the International Space Station. And this launcher rocket will soon operate from ESA's launch site Kourou in French Guiana.
18 posted on 09/30/2007 9:51:43 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
What's amazing is that the R-7 launcher rocket that was designed in the 1950's is still operational today in an updated form as a satellite launcher! The Russians still use it to launch the current generation Soyuz TMA spacecraft that regularly visits the International Space Station. And this launcher rocket will soon operate from ESA's launch site Kourou in French Guiana.

Wow....that is indeed astonishing, I hadn't heard that before.

I suppose it may be because during the Cold War, the Soviets were perhaps madly and frantically trying to catch up with us in other areas, and so new R&D for lifting rockets had to be put on the back burner ?  Particularly when they already had one that worked, a new model may have been difficult for them to justify to their Kremlin bosses.

Considering that the SR-71 Blackbird was a 1950's vintage design and was only retired from service a few years ago, it makes me wonder what's been going on in those secret aerospace research labs for all this time......


19 posted on 09/30/2007 10:01:30 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head
You mean like the fact an even more momentous event happened just 44 days later? I was born!

I’m not laughing though. It makes me feel kind of old!

20 posted on 09/30/2007 10:08:44 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson