Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/29/2007 8:50:34 PM PDT by cool2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cool2007

10 years ago when I was consulting in HC IT, I never heard anyone suggest public funds for electronic medical records investments. Is that even discussed now?


2 posted on 09/29/2007 9:05:39 PM PDT by elfman2 (305-453-0244)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cool2007

I read more closely than usual but still don’t know what “IT” is (unless it’s Clara Bow).


3 posted on 09/29/2007 9:12:07 PM PDT by Migraine (...diversity is great... until it happens to YOU...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cool2007

BUMP


8 posted on 09/29/2007 10:11:46 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cool2007
Don't worry, with socialist style health care, there won't be any future investments for "IT". We'll be like Canada, buying used 20 year old technology from other countries.

Half of Canadian hospitals still don't even have a CT scanner. An MRI is unthinkable, only one per major city in each province.

Besides, with all the doom and gloom talk about a collapsing American economy, talk of government run health care will fade away. Nobody will have jobs (except illegal Mexican aliens) to pay the higher taxes Hillary will need, and all the doctors (nurses as well) will leave the country to work in more profitable places, where they won't be forced to work for wages that won't even pay for the student loans they racked up after 7 years of med school.

It's that very reason Canadian med school graduates have been leaving Canada for the past 15 years, leaving that country so desperate for doctors they import them from 3rd world countries where med school only takes 6 months, and knowing how to read and speak english is optional.

9 posted on 09/29/2007 10:12:16 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cool2007

When my employer took the IT plunge, one of the rationales they used was that it would drastically cut down on paper. Now, some 6-7 years later, they are using a helluva lot MORE paper.

However, we have patient information much more readily available, which does improve patient care in many respects(although it is a lot more work than the archaic “paper” charts).


10 posted on 09/29/2007 11:13:05 PM PDT by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson