Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedomdefender

The “debate” was worse than worthless, and Hannity’s cackling while Paul was trying to answer was classless and beneath contempt. That being said, don’t believe for a second that Paul supporters didn’t spam that poll. 34%? I think not.


4 posted on 09/06/2007 10:56:12 AM PDT by lesser_satan (FRED THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lesser_satan
Hannity’s cackling while Paul was trying to answer was classless and beneath contempt.

Actually, it showed that Hannity isn't secure in his own positions. He was a cheerleader for invading Iraq, and it's now been shown to be a mistake. Now he's cheerleading for invading Iran - and he doesn't want to be challenged, because he knows there are very strong arguments against such a radical action.

9 posted on 09/06/2007 10:58:09 AM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan

Was that Hannity who I could hear laughing during the questions to Paul? What sheer unprofessionalism.


16 posted on 09/06/2007 10:59:20 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
In addition to Paul's cohorts in stupidity...you have the wacky and evil left along with crazy dims texting in to skew that polls...most conservatives are more interested in hearing all the worthy candidates, and still are not ready to commit...my opinion...we saw a great debate, with excellent quality men of character and principle...

Paul will get us killed! figuratively and literally!

69 posted on 09/06/2007 11:20:03 AM PDT by Turborules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan

I am no fan of ron paul, but that cackle was classless. It was a joke when he spoke but to cackle into the open mic was stupid.


96 posted on 09/06/2007 11:30:46 AM PDT by Frep_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
yeah right


110 posted on 09/06/2007 11:37:54 AM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan

Too bad it only allowed you to vote once.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=eUxQadgSkoA


153 posted on 09/06/2007 12:31:55 PM PDT by JJTHEBULL (You're either with US, or you're with the ILLEGALS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan

It was not just Paul supports but Dems who agree with his stance on Iraq..


155 posted on 09/06/2007 12:33:56 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
don’t believe for a second that Paul supporters didn’t spam that poll. 34%? I think not.

We live in a very liberal town on the northern California coast and believe me we conservatives are in the minority---maybe a dozen of us. Anyway, recently I've seen posters and bumper stickers on cars and property that I know do not belong to conservatives. I'm wondering if besides the conservative supporters if there also isn't a large block of liberals trying to spike the polls in hopes of influencing the outcome similar to what happened with Perot. Just an observation.

210 posted on 09/06/2007 2:56:12 PM PDT by mupcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
"don’t believe for a second that Paul supporters didn’t spam that poll"

Not only Paul's real supporters but many leftists who want to promote the "anti-war" message to divide the GOP are spamming such "polls"........ that "poll" is about as scientific as Dennis Kucinich in heat....
227 posted on 09/06/2007 4:36:44 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan

and Hannity’s cackling while Paul was trying to answer was classless and beneath contempt. That being said, don’t believe for a second that Paul supporters didn’t spam that poll. 34%? I think not.

It's obvious that if they didn't spam, let's just say they were more likely to be far more enthusiastic and motivated to call. I don't know what to make of this.

I suppose that is the definition of "Democracy". Squeakiest wheel gets the oil. I remember years ago back in college we had a Student Council President who was very unfriendly to the Greek sytem (Fraternity and Sorority). We were instructed to pick up our beers and march down en mass and vote for the Greek candidate running against him. The folks in the Dorms were unmotivated and didn't care. Take a wild guess who won...by a vote of 1,000+ to 50 something.

232 posted on 09/06/2007 5:04:48 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lesser_satan
...and Hannity’s cackling while Paul was trying to answer was classless and beneath contempt.

I thought it was Rudy doing the cackling.

251 posted on 09/06/2007 6:07:50 PM PDT by Nephi ( $100m ante is a symptom of the old media... the Ron Paul Revolution is the new media's choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson