Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Less Than Half of all Published Scientists Endorse Global Warming Theory
US Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works ^ | August 29, 2007 | Matthew Dempsey

Posted on 08/30/2007 10:50:27 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: olezip
Could there be a conflict of interest for some of these scientists?

Said it before and I'll say it again, when it comes to human endeavors, if the facts don't add up, follow the money.....

21 posted on 08/31/2007 5:07:57 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Made in China: Treat those three words like a warning label)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bluefish
I believe that most who adhere to global warming are merely substituting it for God.
I think the problem is more general than just "most who adhere to global warming." I think that the newswire - AP - functions as an oracle for liberals. If it's not "on the wire", goes the rationale, then it doesn't matter. My tagline puts it a little differently, but it comes to the same thing.

If you think what is not on the wire - at any given time, that would include

Journalists treat the wire, which has everything bad and everything abnormal - to the near-perfect exclusion of anything qualifying for our attention under Philipians 4:8 - as their Oracle. And then people wonder why journalists aren't conservative . . .

Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate

Finally, brethren,
    whatsoever things are true,
    whatsoever things are honest,
    whatsoever things are just,
    whatsoever things are pure,
    whatsoever things are lovely,
    whatsoever things are of good report;
    if there be any virtue,
    and if there be any praise,
think on these things. - Philipians 4:8 (KJV)

22 posted on 08/31/2007 5:18:21 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

bump


23 posted on 08/31/2007 6:59:52 AM PDT by ulm1 (Infanticide,Gay Marriage, Anti GOD, Environmental Nazis. Todays LIEberal DemocRAT Party Platform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Or that other place he seems pull stuff out of...


24 posted on 08/31/2007 8:25:38 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

read later


25 posted on 08/31/2007 9:11:06 AM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The consensus is, there is no consensus!
26 posted on 08/31/2007 9:18:29 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am going to reduce my carbon footprint this weekend. I’ll be laying on the couch so as not to produce excessive CO2 from exhaling. Exercise is the cause of global warming.


27 posted on 08/31/2007 9:20:21 AM PDT by IamConservative (I could never be a liar; there's too much to remember.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
if the facts don't add up, follow the money.....

The definition of modern day liberal political dogma.

28 posted on 08/31/2007 3:27:24 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bluefish
I believe that most who adhere to global warming are merely substituting it for God. It is a religion, because humans have a need for something transcends their own existence.

I disagree. I think they are chasing grant money.

If there is a human-race-threatening crisis, then there will be plenty of grant money showering down on scientists working on global warming, If there is no impending environmental catastrophe, then there is no big paycheck at the end of the rainbow.

Too many scientists these days are whores. They tell the grant writers what the grant writers want to hear, so that they will get grant money. The government grant writers want a crisis, since that justifies a big-budget "War on Global Warming".

29 posted on 08/31/2007 3:36:48 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Open Season rocks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymLJz3N8ayI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JoeGar
The introductory "Summary for Policymakers" -- the only portion usually quoted in the media -- is written not by scientists at all, but by politicians, and approved, word-by-word, by political representatives from member nations. By IPCC policy, the individual report chapters -- the only text actually written by scientists -- are edited to "ensure compliance" with the summary, which is typically published months before the actual report itself.

Fascinating revelation.

That's been widely known, at least here on FR, for quite some time. They've been doing it that way since the IPCC first started issuing it reports.

30 posted on 08/31/2007 3:46:18 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

“post this over”
Work in process


31 posted on 08/31/2007 3:52:57 PM PDT by dynachrome (Henry Bowman is right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Dangit. Site said I was registered, but no open threads to post on. Weird. Try again later
32 posted on 08/31/2007 4:08:36 PM PDT by dynachrome (Henry Bowman is right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wonder if there is a correlation showing that those funded by GW funds are fer it and those that didn’t are agin it.
33 posted on 08/31/2007 4:20:22 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

Nah, I could feel my intellect slipping away as soon as I opened the site! Those phools are too dim for real life...


34 posted on 08/31/2007 7:51:50 PM PDT by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS; bluefish
I believe that most who adhere to global warming are merely substituting it for God.

Only God can control the weather. Some people would like to believe that humans have more control than they do, and they attempt to place more blame on humans because of that. Global warming is a crock...one day, everyone will have no choice but to realize that!

35 posted on 08/31/2007 11:56:59 PM PDT by trussell (Prayer is good for the soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Oh, I wouldn’t disagree with your comment here. You are speaking of the televangelist. I was speaking of those who write the checks.


36 posted on 09/01/2007 12:54:26 AM PDT by bluefish (I'm Hillaryphobing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson