[L98Fiero]

“I’m with you! Ask the Paul haters what their candidate will do to shrink the size of government.”

Ah, we don’t support your guy so we are “haters”. More influence from the left, I see. Disagree and you are a “hater”. Sad and pathetic.

Even more sad and pathetic is that the brunt of Paul’s supporters are anti-war liberal loons. I don’t hate Paul because of that. It does appear you hate his detractors for pointing out that ugly, inconvenient fact.

And lastly, if you think there is a man alive capable of shrinking modern Western government without completely breaking it and starting over, you have no business discussing politics with adults. That “shrinking government” is an idealistic pipe-dream of the highest order. I guess next we will have “world-peace” and “social justice”. Just as realistic.

[Abcdefg]

You know the crowd I was referring to when I wrote “Paul haters”.

[BigTom85]

And lastly, if you think there is a man alive capable of shrinking modern Western government without completely breaking it and starting over, you have no business discussing politics with adults. That “shrinking government” is an idealistic pipe-dream of the highest order. I guess next we will have “world-peace” and “social justice”. Just as realistic.

Shrinking government is easier said then done. However, it makes more than one man. It's going to take 535 bureaucrats in DC to grow some god damn balls in order to get it done. Naturally, most of the bureaucrats love big government... so any drastic cuts within the next 20 yrs will probably never happen.

I Agree with you. Is downsizing DC a good idea? Hell yeah! Will it ever happen? Hell no.