Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missourians Won't Need Sheriff's Permit To Buy Concealable Gun
Kansas City Star ^ | Aug. 22, 2007 | KEVIN MURPHY

Posted on 08/23/2007 1:42:17 PM PDT by neverdem

Residents of Missouri soon will no longer need a sheriff’s permit to buy a concealable gun, although a permit still will be required to carry one.

Missouri lawmakers changed the gun law earlier this year with little of the controversy that often goes with gun legislation. The change will be effective Tuesday.

“It’s something we’ve advocated for some time,” said Kevin Jamison, a Gladstone lawyer who is president of the Missouri Sport Shooting Association, the National Rifle Association affiliate in the state. “This makes it easier for people to buy firearms. They don’t have to get permission first.”

The gun-permit law for purchases dates to 1921, Jamison said. The sheriff has up to seven days to review a permit application and conduct a criminal background check.

So far this year, Jackson County has issued 4,150 permits to acquire a handgun, said Sgt. Judy Farnsworth of the sheriff’s office. The permits generated about $60,000 in fees for the general fund, she said.

Under federal law, gun dealers already do background checks on people who buy handguns from them, so the sheriff’s review is redundant, Jamison said. In addition, going to the sheriff’s office to apply for a permit and then to pick it up is a nuisance, he said.

The sale or transfer of firearms between individuals also will no longer require a criminal background check.

“There will not be any safeguards on that, individual to individual,” Farnsworth said. “It’s always a concern, but there’s not a lot we can do about it.”

Jamison said most sales of handguns are by licensed dealers, so background checks still will have to be done. Though illegal, the transfer of guns without a permit among individuals is already common, he said.

Jamison said gun-rights groups will advise individuals to have a dealer do a computer background check on gun buyers they do not know. The dealers will charge a small fee but have access to criminal records not available to individuals, Jamison said.

Jamison said there was no testimony against the bill this year when the change was made part of a larger, 20-page firearms and self-defense bill.

As word of the new law got out, however, some people mistakenly believed that permits would no longer be needed to carry a weapon, said Deputy Ronda Montgomery, Jackson County Sheriff’s Department spokeswoman.

In a news release this week, Montgomery said that “it is important to note this does not affect the concealed permit law.”

A 2003 Missouri law allowed carrying of concealed weapons, with permission of the sheriff and after training, background checks and other restrictions. All of those rules still apply, Jamison said.

“Buying a handgun does not make you qualified to carry it,” he said.

ON THE WEB For the complete text of the gun purchase legislation, which combined Senate bills 41 and 62, go to www.

senate.mo.gov/07info/ pdf-bill/tat/SB62.pdf.

To reach Kevin Murphy, call (816) 234-4464 or send e-mail to kmurphy@kcstar.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 08/23/2007 1:42:18 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
BANG!
2 posted on 08/23/2007 1:44:57 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; 1stMarylandRegiment; 47carollann; A Citizen Reporter; A Cyrenian; adrian; AFLoggie; ...
Missouri ping

Low volume ping list

FReepmail me to be on, or off, this list.

Ping, ping, piinnngggg
(For those of you that know about Ricochet Rabbit, you'll get the reference.)

Missouri keeps going in the right direction. Now we just need to keep going.

3 posted on 08/23/2007 1:54:11 PM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump


4 posted on 08/23/2007 1:59:53 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Just an FYI...As I understand it, a “shopkeeper” may carry a concealed weapon. (in Missouri)


5 posted on 08/23/2007 2:06:31 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Oh just great, now they do that after my son and I spent seemingly endless miserable hours at the St. Charles sheriff's office trying to get him a permit so that I could give him a pistol for his birthday. The people there were polite enough, but it was glaringly obvious that they didn't like the idea of a mere citizen owning a gun that is prone to jump out of a drawer and start killing innocent people all by itself.

Oh well, better late than never, and by a long shot. Neither of us live in MO now, but I'm glad for all gun owning Missourians anyway.

6 posted on 08/23/2007 2:06:38 PM PDT by epow ("Let the redeemed of the LORD say so, whom he hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

HOOO-DEEEE-HOOOO! AND YIPPIEEEE!!

been wait-en for this several years now.

no longer have to do my shopping out of state.


7 posted on 08/23/2007 2:11:10 PM PDT by urtax$@work (we have faced tenacity before....& The Best kind of Memorial is a BURNING Memorial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demsux
“Just an FYI...As I understand it, a “shopkeeper” may carry a concealed weapon. (in Missouri)”

I have mixed feelings about that. I don’t have any problem at all with a shopkeeper having THE RIGHT to carry a concealed weapon. I support the 2nd Amendment. I just remember from my days in retail learning that the surest way to get shot was to pull a gun to protect the money. The money can be replaced.

8 posted on 08/23/2007 2:56:47 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (RON PAUL: "It will be a little bit better now with the democrats now in charge of oversight ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Any laws where the permission of the county sheriff is required is so prone to politics that they should be discarded. It’s already an undue burden to require citizens to have a permit to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms, but this requirement for the sheriff’s personal imprimatur is ridiculous.


9 posted on 08/23/2007 2:58:40 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epow
Here in Jackson County (Kansas City) it took 2 trips to the dealer and 2 trips to the S.O. Go to dealer and get info on gun, go to S.O. with info and fill out app, go to S.O. to pick up permit when it's ready, go to dealer to complete sale.

The dealers closest to me didn't even like to mess with handguns because of the permit to purchase hassle.

10 posted on 08/23/2007 3:33:41 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby ("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

How’s the real estate market down there?


11 posted on 08/23/2007 3:42:25 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
A 2003 Missouri law allowed carrying of concealed weapons, with permission of the sheriff and after training, background checks and other restrictions. All of those rules still apply, Jamison said.

Don't think so. Missouri is listed as a Shall Issue State.

12 posted on 08/23/2007 4:30:59 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

You have the option to pull the gun out if necessary. To be disarmed doesn’t give you that choice.


13 posted on 08/23/2007 4:33:51 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: g'nad

About time...


14 posted on 08/23/2007 4:34:26 PM PDT by osagebowman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump for publicity


15 posted on 08/23/2007 4:37:18 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dumpster Baby

All that? Really? I just went to sheriff’s office, Springfield. Filled out paperwork, paid $10. Came back a week later and took paper to gun dealer. Glad we don’t have to do that anymore but it was only one trip to each.


16 posted on 08/23/2007 4:41:36 PM PDT by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

What’s a “shall issue” state? It’s my understanding, I can carry in a vehicle like carrying in my home (but must be in plain site {duh, if you want it stolen})but for concealed carry you must pay fees, qualify, another background check, etc.


17 posted on 08/23/2007 4:44:16 PM PDT by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

It’s a degree of concealed carry license. Some states are May Issue and you have to get permission of the local authorities to get a carry permit. California is a May Issue. That means if you are famous, wealthy or politically connected, you can get a conceal permit.

Other states are Shall Issue. The law is written so the vast majority can pay the fees, take the courses and the local authorities have to, by law, issue the permit.


18 posted on 08/23/2007 4:53:40 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

I count 2 trips to each place in your reply! :o)


19 posted on 08/23/2007 4:57:03 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby ("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb
Take a prescription of "having the choice is better than not." Hopefully that will clear up those mixed feelings.

If that doesn't do it, get a shot of "would be criminals who fear for their lives or die learning the lesson."

If the mixed feeling remain, I'm sorry to have to be the one to tell you... it's terminal.

As I tell my liberal sister to really get under her skin, in my Utopia it would be illegal not to carry a gun and not to defend yourself. There would be high casualties at the start but the criminals (and pacifists) would get pared out eventually. Sometimes she looks at me as though I just might be serious.

20 posted on 08/23/2007 5:41:56 PM PDT by HundredDollars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson