Posted on 08/21/2007 9:42:11 PM PDT by anymouse
Texas drivers are tired of traffic gridlock. We want new roads built sooner rather than later, but we do not want a Trans-Texas Corridor that would surely invite more illegal drugs and more illegal aliens.
Legislators have gotten our message but since both highway funds, the State Highway Fund (a gasoline tax) and the Texas Mobility Fund (bond money), have been pilfered for other uses, there is no money for road building.
Members of the Texas Senate Transportation & Homeland Security Committee met on August 7 to discuss this funding dilemma. Committee Chairman John Carona suggested a new constitutional amendment to protect the two existing highway funds from future abuses. He also recommended linking the state gas tax to inflation, in order to keep pace with the economy. Both ideas could be helpful in the future, but do nothing to remedy our current state of affairs.
A new funding scheme, public-private partnerships, was also discussed which allows foreign interests to lease our infrastructure for 50-99 years. Like highway robbers, those private investors would profit as much as 39 times the road building cost and then take their loot and leave the country. That’s a bad deal for Texans who currently own our infrastructure, want to continue to own it and furthermore want our taxes / tolls to be invested back into road building.
The committee has until 2009 to come up with funding solutions, but they would be wise to consider WHY the demand for new roads is so great because it is not just because of population growth. The elephant in the room that no one wants to tackle is the North American Free Trade Agreement, NAFTA, which former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger called “the architecture of a new international system.”
When Congress approved NAFTA in 1993 with a simple majority of both chambers in a lame duck session, they ignored the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that the international treaty be approved by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate. Setting aside our U.S. Constitution has destabilized our borders with Mexico and Canada and created new and mounting crises.
NAFTA has encouraged manufacturers to leave our shores presumably to avoid government regulations and union wages, but at what cost to American workers? Is it fair to force American workers to compete with millions of Communist government-enslaved laborers who earn about 30 cents an hour in Asia?
NAFTA has created a U.S. trade deficit of $725.8 billion, 26% of that, almost $233 billion, is with China. The deficit is not only unsustainable, the Chinese government is now threatening to liquidate its $1.33 trillion of foreign reserves, including about $900 billion in U.S. treasury bonds, as a political weapon if the U.S. imposes trade sanctions to force revaluation of the Chinese currency, the Yuan. Such a move would cause our dollar to collapse!
More than American jobs and the dollar being negatively impacted by NAFTA, importing goods that America used to manufacture causes an enormous strain to our nation’s infrastructure.
As a hearty endorser of this “architecture of a new international system,” President Bush agreed to a Security and Prosperity Partnership ( http://www.spp.gov ) with Canada and Mexico without Congressional approval or debate in March 2005. He then directed the U.S. Departments of Commerce and Transportation to begin merging their bureaucracies with their counterparts in Mexico and Canada. In 2006 he met with the presidents of Mexico and Canada in Cancun, Mexico, and this year he took time from his vacation in Crawford to attend another closed-door meeting with them in Quebec, Canada.
As the President and most members of Congress deny their unconstitutional actions, every state is forced to deal with the consequences of NAFTA and the SPP. Taxpayers must pay for an invasion of illegal aliens and drug traffickers, as well as deal with colossal levels of congestion on our roads.
The tragic Minneapolis bridge disaster last August shined light on the overweight danger to our nation’s infrastructure. Federal transportation officials claim that one-fourth of our nation’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, and one-third of our major roads are in poor or mediocre condition. They further claim that the cost to repair roads and bridges would be $461 billion and that traffic congestion is costing drivers $63 billion a year in wasted time and fuel costs.
Congress is just as guilty as state legislators in spending our highway funds on other projects. To counter their pilfering, they created a new federal program that grants cities $848 million aimed at discouraging people from driving, and in many cases by imposing new tolls or fees. Some in Congress also wanted to raise federal gas taxes, but President Bush quashed that bad idea. Thus far Texas legislators have also rejected a gas tax increase, but they embraced both toll/tax roads and public-private partnership funding.
When Texas taxpayers learned about Cintra, a foreign company public-private partnership, they were outraged. As a result, the legislature passed a moratorium on the public-private partnership scheme to build the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC), the Texas segment of the NAFTA Highway that bisects the entire country from Laredo, TX to Duluth, MN.
Regretfully, Governor Rick Perry vetoed not only the moratorium, but also a law to require our Attorney General to study the impact of federal laws on our state and a good eminent domain bill aimed at protecting farmers and ranchers from the unfair taking of 580,000 acres to build the 12-lane TTC super-highway.
The unconstitutional NAFTA treaty and unilateral SPP agreement are undermining our nation’s sovereignty and security. In order for America to remain strong, we must be able to:
• Produce our own food; • Manufacture our own military equipment; and • Prevent foreign powers from obtaining access to our heartland.
Americans know that our roads have become busier, but few recognize that most of that traffic is due to the fact that we are importing goods that we used to manufacture. Even fewer are aware that as much as 60% of our food is now being imported or that much of our military equipment manufacturing has moved offshore. Yet federal and state lawmakers seem more committed to enabling elitist global interests, than fulfilling their constitutional responsibility to protect citizens from outside threats.
Each state should study the impact of NAFTA and the SPP within its borders, which would rightly lead to the repeal of both.
WHAT YOU CAN DO: It has taken more than a decade to realize the impact of the NAFTA “architecture of a new international system.” It cannot be repealed outright, but as citizens realize the source of the chaos in our communities, then they will influence their Congressmen as we have done with our state legislators in Texas. As for the SPP, ask your Congressman to co-sponsor HR 40 that would require discussion and debate of the president’s unilateral agreement. Congressional switchboard: 202-224-3121.
Looking ahead to the 2009 Texas legislative session, let us ask our representatives to pass another eminent domain bill to protect property owners from unfair takings and another bill to require the Attorney General Abbott to study the impact of federal laws, i.e. NAFTA and the SPP, on our state. Capitol switchboard: 512-463-4630.
TTC ping
The traffic here in SA is always congested and the politicians’ solution is to build a highway to Mexico. Wonderful.
NAFTA has created a U.S. trade deficit of $725.8 billion, 26% of that, almost $233 billion, is with China. The deficit is not only unsustainable, the Chinese government is now threatening to liquidate its $1.33 trillion of foreign reserves, including about $900 billion in U.S. treasury bonds, as a political weapon if the U.S. imposes trade sanctions to force revaluation of the Chinese currency, the Yuan. Such a move would cause our dollar to collapse!ping!
Hardbergers' push to toll 281 and north Loop 1604 is not an answer for the city's traffic. It would be a hinderance.
Beware of Chinese Communist supporters, free traders, low wage supporters and profits seekers, that have no regard for consequences. We are surrounded by traitors.
That we are.
>>When Congress approved NAFTA in 1993 with a simple majority of both chambers in a lame duck session, they ignored the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that the international treaty be approved by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate. Setting aside our U.S. Constitution has destabilized our borders with Mexico and Canada and created new and mounting crises.<<
1. NAFTA is not a treaty. Its legislation regulating international trade. Thus it is not co-equal with the constitution as supreme law of the land.
2. The appeals court judge who threw out the argument made in this article (which is a re-hash of the Steel worker’s union’s lawsuit) said even if it was a treaty it had been ratified under Fast Track while President Bush41 was in office.
3. The Supreme court declined to hear the appeal. This is settled law.
Beware of Chinese Communist supporters, free traders, low wage supporters and profits seekers, that have no regard for consequences. We are surrounded by traitors.
Beware of profit seekers? I’m a capitalist profit seeker and proud of it.
Try reading the entire comment "Mr. Proud Capitalist profit seeker".
Beware of Chinese Communist supporters, free traders, low wage supporters and profits seekers, that have no regard for consequences. We are surrounded by traitors.
I mostly travel inside 410 on the north side, so it’s a bit different. It’s not just rush hour, and not just 281 (which is shut down half the time). There are bottlenecks that pop up at certain times in certain places throughout the day. Critical points that you can’t work around if you have to get somewhere (not to mention after flooding). The problem is a lack of back-road interconnections around those critical points; there are large swaths of land that have no alternative route.
When Congress approved NAFTA in 1993 with a simple majority of both chambers in a lame duck session, they ignored the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that the international treaty be approved by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate. Setting aside our U.S. Constitution has destabilized our borders with Mexico and Canada and created new and mounting crises.
If it is unconstitutional, why isn’t there some constitutional, conservative lawyer taking this on? Or as I fear they are all liberals and don’t care about the Constitution.
Trans-Texas Corridor PING!
i don’t care for the conspiracy theorists.
they confuse issues.
BTTT
“• Produce our own food; • Manufacture our own military equipment; and • Prevent foreign powers from obtaining access to our heartland.”
These SHOULD go without saying. How did We get to this point? Did We sell ourselves out?
When anyone writes about this subject, they have to have a degree of qualification and knowledge of the issue. Otherwise, they have no credibility.
In the case of this article, you only have to read as far as the second paragraph to realize that Cathy Adams doesn't know what the Texas Mobility Fund is and is not qualified.
Then you read down to the fourth paragraph and you see that Cathie Adams doesn't know the difference between a Public Private Partnership and a Comprehensive Development Agreement.
This woman/organization has money and staff. Whay doesn't she get her facts straight and write something credible?
The TTC would raise the cost of commuting in Texas to the point that it would become the single greatest expense of a household, after housing costs.
If you want to see congestion, come through Austin. I used to have an account in Kingsville, and frequently drove through S.A. at 5, and cruised through from 37 to 35 with little or no problem. By the time I got to Austin, 6:15 or so, it was a parking lot. I HATE the traffic in Austin, but luckily Round Rock now has about anything I used to have to go to Austin to get. My girlfriend lives in Houston, and those folks do it right. I-10 is 6+ lanes wide in some places. I love driving in Houston, lots of lanes and everybody hauls a$$.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.