Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mamelukesabre
You are playing with words here Mame, that’s called semantics.

According to the dictionary: maul 1. beat and bruise, injure by clawing, handle roughly.

Pit bulls and other dog attacks are maulings. when you get into the dogs intentions, (he was just playing) you are coming off like a liberal does. ‘But, but ,my dog didn’t mean to maul and kill your child.’ It doesn’t matter if the dog was just playing and not really a mean bad dog. Any dog, pit or other breed who is fully able and 'willing' to kill an adult for no reason, does not belong in society. All dogs were bred to do a job, the job that pit bulls were bred to do is no longer viable.

406 posted on 08/25/2007 7:10:43 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies ]


To: Ditter

“Any dog, pit or other breed who is fully able and ‘willing’ to kill an adult for no reason, does not belong in society. All dogs were bred to do a job, the job that pit bulls were bred to do is no longer viable.”

~~~~~~

I dissagree. You are the one coming off like a liberal. Because YOU deem pitts as unnecessary YOU decide no one should own one. That is the same logic they use to take guns away.

Here’s something for you to think about. Horses kill people all the time. Sometimes intentional, sometimes not. There is no longer any need for horses in today’s society. Why don’t we just ban them all? Obviously these people killed by them are dying needlessly and we should step in and save them by eliminating the horses.

Think about that for awhile, then you can think about retracting your liberal remark.


415 posted on 08/26/2007 10:30:40 AM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson