To: Sub-Driver
The appeals court probably has it right. Martinez committed a crime entering the country, and he could certainly be arrested and deported for that (why the hell isn’t he?), but that prior crime doesn’t necessarily invalidate a probation the way the trial judge reasoned.
15 posted on
08/21/2007 8:35:35 AM PDT by
edsheppa
To: edsheppa
The remedy you suggest is still at hand only because the judge who was overruled made sure that this offender could still be found if she was overturned; as you say, arrest him now on illegal entry charges and hold him for ICE.
Tomorrow, rewrite the law.
64 posted on
08/21/2007 11:26:13 AM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: edsheppa
Nope, first judge was right and second is a jackass. There is no such thing as a law abiding illegal alien. And that is the category the second judge is magically trying to conjure into existence. Like a round square, it is a contradiction in terms, and trying to wish it into existence is futile sophistry.
85 posted on
08/21/2007 3:01:37 PM PDT by
JasonC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson