Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rednesss

Yeah. There are boundaries. These boys were old enough to know better, and to know that there were sexual implications to what they were doing. That’s was the law requires.

They weren’t just being “cute.”


13 posted on 08/20/2007 11:42:13 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: lady lawyer

So by your reasoning, the new age of consent should be 13 because they “know better” at that age????


17 posted on 08/20/2007 11:45:04 AM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer

“That’s was the law requires.”

That corks it! Next you will have your fist in the air, screaming “Alles In Ordnung!”, jawohl?

These are kids in school, in case you forgot. Which you likely merely conveniently forgot in the delicious anticipation of more litigation due to such legal assinities, and best of all - ALL THOSE “FEES”.

While you may be female, there was once, in polite society, an awareness that no lady ever considered being a lawyer. It was the inherent issue of the lawyer being hired to argue either side, regardless of morality, ethics, or the facts.

Hence, I find your screen name to be a tad contradictory and wondered if you were aware of the contradiction?

As you certainly sound like both a lawyer and a feminist, have you considered that Liberals have caused to be such things as the hyper-sexualization of our society - this case being a prime example?

And, correct me if I am wrong, but it was lawyers like yourself, with a host of Liberal groups like ACLU, who forced our schools to tolerate such behaviors under the banners of ‘multi-culturalism, ‘diversity’, ad nauseam.

In closing, have you considered the contradiction between ‘sexual freedom’ so loudly trumpeted by the strumpets in the feminist movements and your “old enough to know better” phrase?


149 posted on 08/20/2007 3:57:38 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer

“That’s was the law requires.”

That corks it! Next you will have your fist in the air, screaming “Alles In Ordnung!”, jawohl?

These are kids in school, in case you forgot. Which you likely merely conveniently forgot in the delicious anticipation of more litigation due to such legal assinities, and best of all - ALL THOSE “FEES”.

While you may be female, there was once, in polite society, an awareness that no lady ever considered being a lawyer. It was the inherent issue of the lawyer being hired to argue either side, regardless of morality, ethics, or the facts.

Hence, I find your screen name to be a tad contradictory and wondered if you were aware of the contradiction?

As you certainly sound like both a lawyer and a feminist, have you considered that Liberals have caused to be such things as the hyper-sexualization of our society - this case being a prime example?

And, correct me if I am wrong, but it was lawyers like yourself, with a host of Liberal groups like ACLU, who forced our schools to tolerate such behaviors under the banners of ‘multi-culturalism, ‘diversity’, ad nauseam.

In closing, have you considered the contradiction between ‘sexual freedom’ so loudly trumpeted by the strumpets in the feminist movements and your “old enough to know better” phrase?


150 posted on 08/20/2007 3:58:05 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer

Then go arrest all the girl who participated in the same, jail and stip search then. I’m all for equality, after all, right?


165 posted on 08/20/2007 8:14:52 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Troops, we've got your back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson