Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xjcsa
The current California proposal would actually enhance this function in most situations

This Cali proposal may have some merit. If all Congressional Districts went the same way in the state, that candidate would get all of the EV. If not, the candidates share them. One thing though, this method moves the outcome to the local Congressional level rather than the state level. Is this a pro or a con? One would think that it would be a positive since currently the states with some big population cities like in NY and CA with a winner-take-all system based on the popular vote of the state eliminates some of the voice in that state. With all Congressional Districts in play, things might get interesting.
34 posted on 08/16/2007 7:13:59 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Kerretarded
One thing though, this method moves the outcome to the local Congressional level rather than the state level. Is this a pro or a con?

The more I think about it, the more I like it, although I still have some mixed feelings. But I think it's still worth considering. It would make some states (i.e. California, New York, Texas) relevant to the campaigns again if they did this.

37 posted on 08/16/2007 7:23:09 AM PDT by xjcsa (Hillary Clinton is nothing more than Karl Marx with huge calves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson