To: tacticalogic
Marbury v. Madison had nothing to do with the commerce clause and I never implied that it did. I brought it up to counter you premise that Madison’s integral role in writing the Consitution somehow gives extra weight to his interpretation of the commerce clause.
328 posted on
08/16/2007 11:27:26 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Marbury v. Madison had nothing to do with the commerce clause and I never implied that it did. I brought it up to counter you premise that Madisons integral role in writing the Consitution somehow gives extra weight to his interpretation of the commerce clause. The Constitution was a collective work, and while Madison committed the verbiage to paper, he wasn't the original author of all of it. He was of the Commerce Clause, however. What's your opinion of Joseph Story and his writings on the Constitution?
330 posted on
08/16/2007 11:34:38 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson